Literature DB >> 16248313

A method for measurement of joint kinematics in vivo by registration of 3-D geometric models with cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging data.

Peter J Barrance1, Glenn N Williams, John E Novotny, Thomas S Buchanan.   

Abstract

A new method is presented for measuring joint kinematics by optimally matching modeled trajectories of geometric surface models of bones with cine phase contrast (cine-PC) magnetic resonance imaging data. The incorporation of the geometric bone models (GBMs) allows computation of kinematics based on coordinate systems placed relative to full 3-D anatomy, as well as quantification of changes in articular contact locations and relative velocities during dynamic motion. These capabilities are additional to those of cine-PC based techniques that have been used previously to measure joint kinematics during activity. Cine-PC magnitude and velocity data are collected on a fixed image plane prescribed through a repetitively moved skeletal joint. The intersection of each GBM with a simulated image plane is calculated as the model moves along a computed trajectory, and cine-PC velocity data are sampled from the regions of the velocity images within the area of this intersection. From the sampled velocity data, the instantaneous linear and angular velocities of a coordinate system fixed to the GBM are estimated, and integration of the linear and angular velocities is used to predict updated trajectories. A moving validation phantom that produces motions and velocity data similar to those observed in an experiment on human knee kinematics was designed. This phantom was used to assess cine-PC rigid body tracking performance by comparing the kinematics of the phantom measured by this method to similar measurements made using a magnetic tracking system. Average differences between the two methods were measured as 2.82 mm rms for anterior/posterior tibial position, and 2.63 deg rms for axial rotation. An intertrial repeatability study of human knee kinematics using the new method produced rms differences in anterior/posterior tibial position and axial rotation of 1.44 mm and 2.35 deg. The performance of the method is concluded to be sufficient for the effective study of kinematic changes caused to knees by soft tissue injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248313     DOI: 10.1115/1.1992524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  8 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Yuichi Hoshino; Kristian Samuelsson; Paulo Araujo; Volker Musahl; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Load-dependent variations in knee kinematics measured with dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Christopher J Westphal; Anne Schmitz; Scott B Reeder; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The effect of a patellar brace on three-dimensional patellar kinematics in patients with lateral patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E J McWalter; D J Hunter; W F Harvey; P McCree; K A Hirko; D T Felson; D R Wilson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Feasibility of using real-time MRI to measure joint kinematics in 1.5T and open-bore 0.5T systems.

Authors:  Christine E Draper; Juan M Santos; Lampros C Kourtis; Thor F Besier; Michael Fredericson; Gary S Beaupre; Garry E Gold; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Accuracy of model-based tracking of knee kinematics and cartilage contact measured by dynamic volumetric MRI.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Arezu Monawer; Rajeev Chaudhary; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 7.  Dynamic MRI to quantify musculoskeletal motion: A systematic review of concurrent validity and reliability, and perspectives for evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Bhushan Borotikar; Mathieu Lempereur; Mathieu Lelievre; Valérie Burdin; Douraied Ben Salem; Sylvain Brochard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.