Literature DB >> 16246369

Fine structure analysis of a protein folding transition state; distinguishing between hydrophobic stabilization and specific packing.

Burcu Anil1, Satoshi Sato, Jae-Hyun Cho, Daniel P Raleigh.   

Abstract

Developing a detailed understanding of the structure and energetics of protein folding transition states is a key step in describing the folding process. The phi-value analysis approach allows the energetic contribution of side-chains to be mapped out by comparing wild-type with individual mutants where conservative changes are introduced. Studies where multiple substitutions are made at individual sites are much rarer but are potentially very useful for understanding the contribution of each element of a side-chain to transition state formation, and for distinguishing the relative importance of specific packing versus hydrophobic interactions. We have made a series of conservative mutations at multiple buried sites in the N-terminal domain of L9 in order to assess the relative importance of specific side-chain packing versus less specific hydrophobic stabilization of the transition state. A total of 28 variants were prepared using both naturally occurring and non-naturally occurring amino acids at six sites. Analysis of the mutants by NMR and CD showed no perturbation of the structure. There is no correlation between changes in hydrophobicity and changes in stability. In contrast, there is excellent linear correlation between the hydrophobicity of a side-chain and the log of the folding rate, ln(k(f)). The correlation between ln(k(f)) and the change in hydrophobicity holds even for substitutions that change the shape and/or size of a side-chain significantly. For most sites, the correlation with the logarithm of the unfolding rate, ln(k(u)), is much worse. Mutants with more hydrophobic amino acid substitutions fold faster, and those with less hydrophobic amino acid substitutions fold slower. The results show that hydrophobic interactions amongst core residues are an important driving force for forming the transition state, and are more important than specific tight packing interactions. Finally, a number of substitutions lead to negative phi-values and the origin of these effects are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246369     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  19 in total

1.  Folding transition-state and denatured-state ensembles of FSD-1 from folding and unfolding simulations.

Authors:  Hongxing Lei; Shubhra Ghosh Dastidar; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Hydrophobicity density profiles to predict thermal stability enhancement in proteins.

Authors:  Angel Mozo-Villarías; Juan Cedano; Enrique Querol
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Transition states in protein folding kinetics: modeling phi-values of small beta-sheet proteins.

Authors:  Thomas R Weikl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Side chain burial and hydrophobic core packing in protein folding transition states.

Authors:  Patrick J Farber; Anthony Mittermaier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Temperature-dependent Hammond behavior in a protein-folding reaction: analysis of transition-state movement and ground-state effects.

Authors:  Humeyra Taskent; Jae-Hyun Cho; Daniel P Raleigh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Mapping backbone and side-chain interactions in the transition state of a coupled protein folding and binding reaction.

Authors:  Annett Bachmann; Dirk Wildemann; Florian Praetorius; Gunter Fischer; Thomas Kiefhaber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The N-Terminal Domain of Ribosomal Protein L9 Folds via a Diffuse and Delocalized Transition State.

Authors:  Satoshi Sato; Jae-Hyun Cho; Ivan Peran; Rengin G Soydaner-Azeloglu; Daniel P Raleigh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  The loop hypothesis: contribution of early formed specific non-local interactions to the determination of protein folding pathways.

Authors:  Tomer Orevi; Gil Rahamim; Gershon Hazan; Dan Amir; Elisha Haas
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-04-12

Review 9.  Islet amyloid: from fundamental biophysics to mechanisms of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Ping Cao; Peter Marek; Harris Noor; Vadim Patsalo; Ling-Hsien Tu; Hui Wang; Andisheh Abedini; Daniel P Raleigh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Desolvation and development of specific hydrophobic core packing during Im7 folding.

Authors:  Alice I Bartlett; Sheena E Radford
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.