Literature DB >> 16245023

X-ray-induced deletion complexes in embryonic stem cells on mouse chromosome 15.

Wallace S H Chick1, Sarah E Mentzer, Donald A Carpenter, Eugene M Rinchik, Dabney Johnson, Yun You.   

Abstract

Chromosomal deletions have long been used as genetic tools in dissecting the functions of complex genomes, and new methodologies are still being developed to achieve the maximum coverage. In the mouse, where the chromosomal deletion coverage is far less extensive than that in Drosophila, substantial coverage of the genome with deletions is strongly desirable. This article reports the generation of three deletion complexes in the distal part of mouse Chromosome (Chr) 15. Chromosomal deletions were efficiently induced by X rays in embryonic stem (ES) cells around the Otoconin 90 (Oc 90), SRY-box-containing gene 10 (Sox 10), and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1b (Cpt 1 b) loci. Deletions encompassing the Oc 90 and Sox 10 loci were transmitted to the offspring of the chimeric mice that were generated from deletion-bearing ES cells. Whereas deletion complexes encompassing the Sox 10 and the Cpt 1 b loci overlap each other, no overlap of the Oc 90 complex with the Sox 10 complex was found, possibly indicating the existence of a haploinsufficient gene located between Oc 90 and Sox 10. Deletion frequency and size induced by X rays depend on the selective locus, possibly reflecting the existence of haplolethal genes in the vicinity of these loci that yield fewer and smaller deletions. Deletions induced in ES cells by X rays vary in size and location of breakpoints, which makes them desirable for mapping and for functional genomics studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16245023     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-005-0011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  60 in total

1.  Cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic cues regulating lineage decisions in multipotent neural crest-derived progenitor cells.

Authors:  Christian Paratore; Lilian Hagedorn; Julien Floris; Lisette Hari; Maurice Kléber; Ueli Suter; Lukas Sommer
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.203

2.  Genomic DNA microextraction: a method to screen numerous samples.

Authors:  R Ramírez-Solis; J Rivera-Pérez; J D Wallace; M Wims; H Zheng; A Bradley
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Genetic and molecular analysis of chlorambucil-induced germ-line mutations in the mouse.

Authors:  E M Rinchik; J W Bangham; P R Hunsicker; N L Cacheiro; B S Kwon; I J Jackson; L B Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A microsatellite map of the pink-eyed dilution (p) deletion complex in mouse Chromosome 7

Authors: 
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Molecular genetic analysis of the dilute-short ear (d-se) region of the mouse.

Authors:  E M Rinchik; L B Russell; N G Copeland; N A Jenkins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Genetic control of morphogenetic and biochemical differentiation: lethal albino deletions in the mouse.

Authors:  S Gluecksohn-Waelsch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Interdigitated deletion complexes on mouse chromosome 5 induced by irradiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  J C Schimenti; B J Libby; R A Bergstrom; L A Wilson; D Naf; L M Tarantino; A Alavizadeh; A Lengeling; M Bucan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  J W Thomas; C LaMantia; T Magnuson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Spectrum of Bmp5 mutations from germline mutagenesis experiments in mice.

Authors:  P C Marker; K Seung; A E Bland; L B Russell; D M Kingsley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Annette L Parks; Kevin R Cook; Marcia Belvin; Nicholas A Dompe; Robert Fawcett; Kari Huppert; Lory R Tan; Christopher G Winter; Kevin P Bogart; Jennifer E Deal; Megan E Deal-Herr; Deanna Grant; Marie Marcinko; Wesley Y Miyazaki; Stephanie Robertson; Kenneth J Shaw; Mariano Tabios; Valentina Vysotskaia; Lora Zhao; Rachel S Andrade; Kyle A Edgar; Elizabeth Howie; Keith Killpack; Brett Milash; Amanda Norton; Doua Thao; Kellie Whittaker; Millicent A Winner; Lori Friedman; Jonathan Margolis; Matthew A Singer; Casey Kopczynski; Daniel Curtis; Thomas C Kaufman; Gregory D Plowman; Geoffrey Duyk; Helen L Francis-Lang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Creating a "hopeful monster": mouse forward genetic screens.

Authors:  Vanessa L Horner; Tamara Caspary
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

2.  Microvillous cells expressing IP3 receptor type 3 in the olfactory epithelium of mice.

Authors:  Colleen C Hegg; Cuihong Jia; Wallace S Chick; Diego Restrepo; Anne Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Homozygous carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1b (muscle isoform) deficiency is lethal in the mouse.

Authors:  Shaonin Ji; Yun You; Janos Kerner; Charles L Hoppel; Trenton R Schoeb; Wallace S H Chick; Doug A Hamm; J Daniel Sharer; Philip A Wood
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.797

4.  Transmission of mutant phenotypes from ES cells to adult mice.

Authors:  Wallace S Chick; Derek A Drechsel; Warren Hammond; Manisha Patel; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Screening for stress-resistance mutations in the mouse.

Authors:  Wallace S Chick; Michael Ludwig; Xiaoyun Zhao; David Kitzenberg; Kristina Williams; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.