Literature DB >> 16245007

The inducement of meaningful work: a response to Anderson and Weijer.

Terrence P McEachern1.   

Abstract

James A. Anderson and Charles Weijer take the wage payment model proposed by Neil Dickert and Christine Grady and extend the analogy of research participation to unskilled wage labor to include just working conditions. Although noble in its intentions, this moral extension generates unsavory outcomes. Most notably, Anderson and Weijer distinguish between two types of research subjects: occasional and professional. The latter, in this case, receives benefits beyond the moral minima in the form of "the right to meaningful work." The problem is that meaningful work can itself be a form of inducement, and consequently, may in fact increase the incidence of inducement contrary to the intentions of the wage payment model.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16245007     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-004-7582-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  1 in total

1.  The research subject as wage earner.

Authors:  James A Anderson; Charles Weijer
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2002
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.