Literature DB >> 12516838

The research subject as wage earner.

James A Anderson1, Charles Weijer.   

Abstract

The practice of paying research subjects for participating in clinical trials has yet to receive an adequate moral analysis. Dickert and Grady argue for a wage payment model in which research subjects are paid an hourly wage based on that of unskilled laborers. If we accept this approach, what follows? Norms for just working conditions emerge from workplace legislation and political theory. All workers, including paid research subjects under Dickert and Grady's analysis, have a right to at least minimum wage, a standard work week, extra pay for overtime hours, a safe workplace, no fault compensation for work-related injury, and union organization. If we accept that paid research subjects are wage earners like any other, then the implications for changes to current practice are substantial.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12516838     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021265824313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  3 in total

1.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.

Authors:  N Dickert; C Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  T Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Ethics. Protecting communities in biomedical research.

Authors:  C Weijer; E J Emanuel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Strategies to minimize risks and exploitation in phase one trials on healthy subjects.

Authors:  Adil E Shamoo; David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  The inducement of meaningful work: a response to Anderson and Weijer.

Authors:  Terrence P McEachern
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

3.  Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects.

Authors:  David B Resnik; D B Resnick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.464

5.  'Transport to Where?': Reflections on the problem of value and time à propos an awkward practice in medical research.

Authors:  P Wenzel Geissler
Journal:  J Cult Econ       Date:  2011-02

6.  Are all "research fields" equal? Rethinking practice for the use of data from crowdsourcing market places.

Authors:  Ilka H Gleibs
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.