Literature DB >> 16244918

Safety risks for animals fed genetic modified (GM) plants.

G Bertoni1, P Ajmone Marsan.   

Abstract

GM plants are widely grown all over the world, but many constraints still tend to discourage their use in Europe. Potential risks suggested to be associated with the use of GM are unexpected gene effects, allergenic potential, antibiotic resistance, gene flow. GM feed safety is presently evaluated by adopting the concept of GM substantial equivalence, by comparison with non-GM isogenic crops. Comparison is based on a wide spectrum of chemical components and on livestock performance. From the available experimental data, currently utilized GM plants appear safe and show no effects on animals or animal products. Hence, although they potentially exist, safety risks caused by the use of GM plants appear to be so low as be negligible in comparison with their potential benefits, if appropriately designed. GM plants represent a valuable option for future breeding, to increase yield while reducing the use of pesticides, improve plant adaptation to unfavourable environments, and produce better quality crops, also from a nutritional point of view. Nonetheless, GM crops are novel foods and the assessment of their safety using a scientific sound approach seems essential to protect the environment, as well as the health of humans and livestock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16244918     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-005-0004-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  8 in total

Review 1.  Safety considerations of DNA in food.

Authors:  D A Jonas; I Elmadfa; K H Engel; K J Heller; G Kozianowski; A König; D Müller; J F Narbonne; W Wackernagel; J Kleiner
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.374

Review 2.  Genetically modified foods, science, consumers and the media.

Authors:  I R Rowland
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 3.  Food safety evaluation of crops produced through biotechnology.

Authors:  Bruce M Chassy
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Detection of corn intrinsic and recombinant DNA fragments and Cry1Ab protein in the gastrointestinal contents of pigs fed genetically modified corn Bt11.

Authors:  E H Chowdhury; H Kuribara; A Hino; P Sultana; O Mikami; N Shimada; K S Guruge; M Saito; Y Nakajima
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Feeding value of corn silage estimated with sheep and dairy cows is not altered by genetic incorporation of Bt1376 resistance to Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  Y Barrière; R Vérité; P Brunschwig; F Surault; J C Emile
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effects of feeding rations with genetically modified whole cottonseed to lactating Holstein cows.

Authors:  A R Castillo; M R Gallardo; M Maciel; J M Giordano; G A Conti; M C Gaggiotti; O Quaino; C Gianni; G F Hartnell
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Determining whether transgenic and endogenous plant DNA and transgenic protein are detectable in muscle from swine fed Roundup Ready soybean meal.

Authors:  J C Jennings; D C Kolwyck; S B Kays; A J Whetsell; J B Surber; G L Cromwell; R P Lirette; K C Glenn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood, and feces of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  R H Phipps; E R Deaville; B C Maddison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.034

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods.

Authors:  Richard E Goodman; Afua O Tetteh
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Fate of transgenic DNA from orally administered Bt MON810 maize and effects on immune response and growth in pigs.

Authors:  Maria C Walsh; Stefan G Buzoianu; Gillian E Gardiner; Mary C Rea; Eva Gelencsér; Anna Jánosi; Michelle M Epstein; R Paul Ross; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Immunotoxicological evaluation of corn genetically modified with Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ah gene by a 30-day feeding study in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Yan Song; Chunlai Liang; Wei Wang; Jin Fang; Nana Sun; Xudong Jia; Ning Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of Phytase Transgenic Corn on the Intestinal Microflora and the Fate of Transgenic DNA and Protein in Digesta and Tissues of Broilers.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Jiang Guo; Sufen Li; Ang Li; Liyang Zhang; Zhenhua Liu; Xugang Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.