Literature DB >> 15453492

Effects of feeding rations with genetically modified whole cottonseed to lactating Holstein cows.

A R Castillo1, M R Gallardo, M Maciel, J M Giordano, G A Conti, M C Gaggiotti, O Quaino, C Gianni, G F Hartnell.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, and milk composition from feeding rations that contained different sources of genetically modified whole cottonseed to Argentinean Holstein dairy cows. Twenty-four lactating multiparous Argentinean Holstein dairy cows were used in 2 experiments with a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design, with cows averaging 565 kg body weight and 53 d in milk at the beginning of the experiments. Treatments in Experiment 1 were: Bollgard cotton containing the cry1Ac gene, Bollgard II cotton containing cry1Ac and cry2Ab genes, Roundup Ready cotton containing the cp4 epsps gene, and a control nongenetically modified but genetically similar cottonseed. In Experiment 2, two commercial sources, a parental control line, and the transgenic cotton containing both cry1Ac and cp4 epsps genes were used as treatments. All cows received the same total mixed ration but with different whole cottonseed sources. Cottonseed was included to provide 2.50 kg per cow daily (dry matter [DM] basis) or about 10% of the total diet DM. The ingredient composition of the total mixed ration was 32% alfalfa hay, 28% corn silage, 22% corn grain, 17% soybean meal, and 2% minerals and vitamins. In addition, genomic DNA was extracted from a subset of milk samples and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction followed by Southern blot hybridization for small fragments of the cry1Ac transgene and an endogenous cotton gene, acp1. No sample was positive for transgenic or plant DNA fragments at the limits of detection for the assays following detailed data evaluation criteria. The DMI, milk yield, milk composition, body weight, and body condition score did not differ among treatments. Cottonseed from genetically modified varieties used in these studies yielded similar performance in lactating dairy cows when compared to non-transgenic control and reference cottonseed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15453492     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73333-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

Review 1.  Safety risks for animals fed genetic modified (GM) plants.

Authors:  G Bertoni; P Ajmone Marsan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Nutritional evaluation of transgenic cottonseed in the ration of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Ranjan K Mohanta; Kamal K Singhal; Amrish K Tyagi; Y S Rajput; Shiv Prasad
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

4.  Nutritional Assessment of Dietary Bt and Cp4EPSPS Proteins on the Serum Biochemical Changes of Rabbits at Different Developmental Stages.

Authors:  Ibrahim B Salisu; Ahmad A Shahid; Qasim Ali; Abdul Q Rao; Tayyab Husnain
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-06-05

5.  Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA fragments and proteins in the digesta, blood, tissues, and eggs of laying hens fed with phytase transgenic corn.

Authors:  Qiugang Ma; Chunqi Gao; Jianyun Zhang; Lihong Zhao; Wenbo Hao; Cheng Ji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Glyphosate in livestock: feed residues and animal health1.

Authors:  John L Vicini; William R Reeves; John T Swarthout; Katherine A Karberg
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.