Literature DB >> 16244864

Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence.

Annette C Dobben1, Maaike P Terra, Bary Berghmans, Marije Deutekom, Guy E E Boeckxstaens, Lucas W M Janssen, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy is a common treatment option in patients with fecal incontinence. Although physiotherapy may result in relief of symptoms, to what extent improvement is associated with changes in anorectal function is still unclear. AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate prospectively how anorectal function changes with physiotherapy and whether these changes are related to changes in fecal incontinence score.
METHODS: Consenting consecutive patients (n=266) with fecal incontinence (91% women; mean age, 59 years) underwent anorectal manometry, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity measurements, and rectal capacity measurement at baseline and after nine sessions of standardized pelvic floor physiotherapy. These findings were compared with changes in Vaizey incontinence score.
RESULTS: On follow-up 3 months after physiotherapy, squeeze pressure (p=0.028), as well as urge sensation threshold (p=0.046) and maximum tolerable volume (p=0.018), had increased significantly. The extent of improvement was not related to age, duration of fecal incontinence, menopause, and endosonography findings. All other anorectal functions did not change. An improvement in the Vaizey score was moderately correlated with an increase in incremental squeeze pressure (r=0.14, p=0.04) and a decrease in anal mucosal sensitivity threshold (r=0.20, p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapy improves squeeze pressure, urge sensation, and maximum tolerable volume. However, improved anorectal function does not always result in a decrease in fecal incontinence complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16244864     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0049-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

Review 1.  Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors.

Authors:  M J Borrie; H A Davidson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M A Kamm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-14

5.  How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders?

Authors:  S S Rao; R S Patel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Risk factors for fecal incontinence in a nursing home population.

Authors:  J F Johanson; F Irizarry; A Doughty
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 7.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination.

Authors:  P J Isherwood; A Rane
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Robert D Madoff; Susan C Parker; Madhulika G Varma; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination.

Authors:  S S Rao; K D Welcher; J S Leistikow
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  6 in total

1.  Manometric study in ulcerative colitis patients with modified ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by G. Kobakov et al.

Authors:  A J Kroesen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation induces changes in the pelvic floor and rectum that improve continence and quality of life.

Authors:  Susanne Dorothea Otto; Stefanie Burmeister; Heinz J Buhr; Anton Kroesen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of the Bowel Management Program on the quality of life in children with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  João H F Colares; Marionescu Purcaru; Guilherme P F da Silva; Mirna A Frota; Carlos A B da Silva; Antônio A Melo-Filho; Andrea Bischoff; Alberto Peña
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Anal pressure in experimental diabetes.

Authors:  Juliana Tieppo; Nélson A Kretzmann Filho; Maura Seleme; Henrique S Fillmann; Bary Berghmans; Norma Possa Marroni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Bischoff; Marc A Levitt; Alberto Peña
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Supervised pelvic floor muscle training versus attention-control massage treatment in patients with faecal incontinence: Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anja Ussing; Inge Dahn; Ulla Due; Michael Sørensen; Janne Petersen; Thomas Bandholm
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.