Literature DB >> 1624485

Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast.

J K Burkus1, J E Lonstein, R B Winter, F Denis.   

Abstract

The medical records and radiographs of forty-two adolescents (twenty-three male and nineteen female) who had had a posterolateral spinal arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis between 1950 and 1986 were reviewed to assess the long-term outcome of this form of treatment. The average age of the patients at the time of the operation was fourteen years (range, seven years and nine months to seventeen years and eleven months). The duration of the clinical and radiographic follow-up ranged from two years to twenty-seven years and seven months. All patients had an in situ arthrodesis of the involved vertebrae. Eighteen patients had no additional intervention, and twenty-four patients had reduction and application of a cast. Use of the cast led to a decrease in sagittal translation of more than 5 per cent in eighteen patients and a decrease in lumbosacral kyphosis (the slip angle) of more than 5 degrees in fourteen patients. Of the patients who did not have a cast, eight had an increase in sagittal translation of more than 5 per cent and ten had an increase in lumbosacral kyphosis of more than 5 degrees. There were no neurological problems at the time of the initial operation or after the reduction maneuver. At the most recent clinical follow-up examination, thirty-eight patients had no complaints of low-back pain or any restriction of work-related or recreational activities. Persistent low-back pain and pain in the lower extremities limited the activities of the remaining four patients, two of whom had another operation to alleviate these symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1624485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  No correlation between patient outcome and abnormal lumbar MRI findings 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ville M Remes; Tommi S Lamberg; Pekka O Tervahartiala; Ilkka J Helenius; Kalevi Osterman; Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Yrjönen; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko S Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Surgical therapy for spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  A Wild; K Seller; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Assessment of lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis: a computer-assisted reliability study of six measurement techniques.

Authors:  Panagiotis Glavas; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Stefan Parent; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Return of motor evoked potentials after knee flexion in the setting of high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Justin Tilan; Lindsay M Andras; Mark D Krieger; David L Skaggs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Outcome of L5 radiculopathy after reduction and instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of high-grade L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis and the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Ralph T Schär; Martin Sutter; Anne F Mannion; Andreas Eggspühler; Dezsö Jeszenszky; Tamas F Fekete; Frank Kleinstück; Daniel Haschtmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with instrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis: description and association of clinico-surgical variables with prognosis in a series of 36 cases.

Authors:  Monica Lara-Almunia; Juan A Gomez-Moreta; Javier Hernandez-Vicente
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-06-09

7.  Long-term clinical, functional and radiological outcome 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion in childhood and adolescence isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Tommi S Lamberg; Ville M Remes; Ilkka J Helenius; Dietrich K Schlenzka; Timo A Yrjönen; Kalevi E Osterman; Pekka O Tervahartiala; Seppo K Seitsalo; Mikko S Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  An Alternative Operative Approach to Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Matthew Putty; Gina Guglielmi; Hamad Farhat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

9.  Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters with L5 as the New Sacrum after Fusion in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Possible Explanation for Satisfactory Results with In-Situ Fusion.

Authors:  Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Gurudip Das; Siddharth Narasimhan Aiyer; Rishi Mugesh Kanna; Ajoy Prasad Shetty
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.