Literature DB >> 16244812

Re-designing state mental health policy to prevent the use of seclusion and restraint.

Kevin Ann Huckshorn1.   

Abstract

: The members of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) believe that seclusion and restraint, including "chemical restraints," are safety interventions of last resort and are not treatment interventions. Seclusion and restraint should never be used for the purposes of discipline, coercion, or staff convenience, or as a replacement for adequate levels of staff or active treatment. The use of seclusion and restraint creates significant risks for people with psychiatric disabilities. These risks include serious injury or death, retraumatization of people who have a history of trauma, and loss of dignity and other psychological harm. In light of these potential serious consequences, seclusion and restraint should be used only when there exists an imminent risk of danger to the individual or others and no other safe and effective intervention is possible. (Endorsed by the State Mental Health Directors, July 13, 1999). (NASMHPD 1999, NASMHPD Position Statement on Seclusion and Restraint. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16244812     DOI: 10.1007/s10488-005-0011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health        ISSN: 0894-587X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends.

Authors:  Tilman Steinert; Peter Lepping; Renate Bernhardsgrütter; Andreas Conca; Trond Hatling; Wim Janssen; Alice Keski-Valkama; Fermin Mayoral; Richard Whittington
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?

Authors:  Patricia S Mann-Poll; Annet Smit; Eric O Noorthoorn; Wim A Janssen; Bauke Koekkoek; Giel J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2018-09

3.  Youth pathways to placement: the influence of gender, mental health need and trauma on confinement in the juvenile justice system.

Authors:  Erin M Espinosa; Jon R Sorensen; Molly A Lopez
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-07-04

4.  Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions.

Authors:  Irina Georgieva; Cornelis L Mulder; Richard Whittington
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Professionals' attitudes after a seclusion reduction program: anything changed?

Authors:  P S Mann-Poll; A Smit; M van Doeselaar; G J M Hutschemaekers
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2013-03

6.  Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion.

Authors:  Irina Georgieva; C L Mulder; A Wierdsma
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-03

7.  High and Intensive Care in Psychiatry: Validating the HIC Monitor as a Tool for Assessing the Quality of Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  A L van Melle; Y Voskes; H C W de Vet; J van der Meijs; C L Mulder; G A M Widdershoven
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2019-01

8.  "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.

Authors:  Jan Bergk; Erich Flammer; Tilman Steinert
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Who is Subjected to Coercive Measures as a Psychiatric Inpatient? A Multi-Level Analysis.

Authors:  E Flammer; T Steinert; F Eisele; J Bergk; C Uhlmann
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2013-07-12

10.  Barriers and facilitators to the effective de-escalation of conflict behaviours in forensic high-secure settings: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helena Goodman; Cat Papastavrou Brooks; Owen Price; Elizabeth Alexandra Barley
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2020-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.