Literature DB >> 16244265

Salivary gland tumors at in vivo proton MR spectroscopy.

Ann D King1, David K W Yeung, Anil T Ahuja, Gary M K Tse, H Y Yuen, K T Wong, Andrew C van Hasselt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate whether proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy can be used to characterize salivary gland tumors (SGTs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Hydrogen 1 ((1)H) MR spectroscopy was performed with echo times of 136 and 272 msec at 1.5 T in both SGTs and normal parotid glands. Spectra were analyzed in the time domain by using prior knowledge in the fitting procedure to obtain peak amplitudes of choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and unsuppressed water. Mean Cho/Cr and Cho/water ratios for each subgroup of SGTs were obtained, and results were compared by using a nonparametric t test.
RESULTS: Successful spectra were acquired in 56 patients (35 men, 21 women; mean age, 56 years) with a total of nine malignant tumors and 47 benign SGTs (24 Warthin tumors, 22 pleomorphic adenomas, one oncocytoma). At an echo time of 136 msec, Cho/Cr ratios were obtained in 26 (47%) of 55 spectra, with a mean value (+/- standard deviation) of 1.73 +/- 0.47, 5.49 +/- 1.86, 3.46 +/- 0.84, and 2.45 for malignant tumors, Warthin tumors, pleomorphic adenomas, and oncocytoma, respectively. Differences were significant between Warthin tumors and pleomorphic adenomas (P = .028) and between benign SGTs and malignant tumors (P < .001). At an echo time of 272 msec, Cho/Cr ratios were obtained in 16 (30%) of 53 spectra, with a mean value of 2.27 +/- 0.69, 6.92 +/- 1.47, and 3.67 +/- 1.23 for malignant tumors, Warthin tumors, and pleomorphic adenomas, respectively. Differences were also significant between Warthin tumors and pleomorphic adenomas (P = .041) and benign SGTs and malignant tumors (P = .004). There was a significant difference in mean Cho/water ratio for Warthin tumors versus pleomorphic adenomas at echo times of 136 msec (P = .003) and 272 msec (P = .002) but not for benign SGTs versus malignant tumors.
CONCLUSION: (1)H MR spectroscopy may be used to characterize SGTs, but a larger study is required to validate these initial results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16244265     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2372041309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biologic imaging of head and neck cancer: the present and the future.

Authors:  A Srinivasan; S Mohan; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in the diagnosis of lympho-associated benign and malignant lesions in the parotid gland.

Authors:  Ling Zhu; Chunye Zhang; Yi Hua; Jie Yang; Qiang Yu; Xiaofeng Tao; Jiawei Zheng
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  MR imaging of parotid tumors: typical lesion characteristics in MR imaging improve discrimination between benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  A Christe; C Waldherr; R Hallett; P Zbaeren; H Thoeny
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the sublingual gland: A case report.

Authors:  Ji-Young Song
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 5.  Contemporary management of tumors of the salivary glands.

Authors:  Joseph M Scianna; Guy J Petruzzelli
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Malignant tumors and chronic infections in the masticator space: preliminary assessment with in vivo single-voxel 1H-MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Q Yu; J Yang; P Wang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Actual applications of magnetic resonance imaging in dentomaxillofacial region.

Authors:  Migi Johnson; L S Sreela; Philips Mathew; Twinkle S Prasad
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Pictorial essay: Salivary gland imaging.

Authors:  Rajul Rastogi; Sumeet Bhargava; Govindarajan Janardan Mallarajapatna; Sudhir Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  Advanced magnetic resonance imaging findings in salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Erkan Gökçe; Murat Beyhan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-28

Review 10.  Imaging of salivary gland tumours.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.