Literature DB >> 16243467

Results of the 2003-2004 GEP-ISFG collaborative study on mitochondrial DNA: focus on the mtDNA profile of a mixed semen-saliva stain.

Manuel Crespillo1, Miguel R Paredes, Lourdes Prieto, Marta Montesino, Antonio Salas, Cristina Albarran, V Alvarez-Iglesias, Antonio Amorin, Gemma Berniell-Lee, Antonio Brehm, Juan C Carril, Daniel Corach, Nerea Cuevas, Ana M Di Lonardo, Christian Doutremepuich, Rosa M Espinheira, Marta Espinoza, Felix Gómez, Alberto González, Alexis Hernández, M Hidalgo, Magda Jimenez, Fabio P N Leite, Ana M López, Manuel López-Soto, Jose A Lorente, Shintia Pagano, Ana M Palacio, José J Pestano, Maria F Pinheiro, Eduardo Raimondi, M M Ramón, Florangel Tovar, Lidia Vidal-Rioja, Maria C Vide, Martín R Whittle, Juan J Yunis, Julia Garcia-Hirschfel.   

Abstract

We report here a review of the seventh mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) exercise undertaken by the Spanish and Portuguese working group (GEP) of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) corresponding to the period 2003-2004. Five reference bloodstains from five donors (M1-M5), a mixed stain of saliva and semen (M6), and a hair sample (M7) were submitted to each participating laboratory for nuclear DNA (nDNA; autosomal STR and Y-STR) and mtDNA analysis. Laboratories were asked to investigate the contributors of samples M6 and M7 among the reference donors (M1-M5). A total of 34 laboratories reported total or partial mtDNA sequence data from both, the reference bloodstains (M1-M5) and the hair sample (M7) concluding a match between mtDNA profiles of M5 and M7. Autosomal STR and Y-STR profiling was the preferred strategy to investigate the contributors of the semen/saliva mixture (M6). Nuclear DNA profiles were consistent with a mixture of saliva from the donor (female) of M4 and semen from donor M5, being the semen (XY) profile the dominant component of the mixture. Strikingly, and in contradiction to the nuclear DNA analysis, mtDNA sequencing results yield a more simple result: only the saliva contribution (M4) was detected, either after preferential lysis or after complete DNA digestion. Some labs provided with several explanations for this finding and carried out additional experiments to explain this apparent contradictory result. The results pointed to the existence of different relative amounts of nuclear and mtDNAs in saliva and semen. We conclude that this circumstance could strongly influence the interpretation of the mtDNA evidence in unbalanced mixtures and in consequence lead to false exclusions. During the GEP-ISFG annual conference a validation study was planned to progress in the interpretation of mtDNA from different mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243467     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

Review 1.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Haplogrouping mitochondrial DNA sequences in Legal Medicine/Forensic Genetics.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt; Mannis van Oven; Antonio Salas
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Multiplex analysis of mitochondrial DNA pathogenic and polymorphic sequence variants.

Authors:  Jason C Poole; Vincent Procaccio; Martin C Brandon; Greg Merrick; Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.915

4.  Minisequencing mitochondrial DNA pathogenic mutations.

Authors:  Vanesa Alvarez-Iglesias; Francisco Barros; Angel Carracedo; Antonio Salas
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.103

5.  Results of a collaborative study on DNA identification of aged bone samples.

Authors:  Daniel Vanek; Bruce Budowle; Jitka Dubska-Votrubova; Angie Ambers; Jan Frolik; Martin Pospisek; Ahmed Anwar Al Afeefi; Khalid Ismaeil Al Hosani; Marie Allen; Khudooma Saeed Al Naimi; Dina Al Salafi; Wafa Ali Rashid Al Tayyari; Wendy Arguetaa; Michel Bottinelli; Magdalena M Bus; Jan Cemper-Kiesslich; Olivier Cepil; Greet De Cock; Stijn Desmyter; Hamid El Amri; Hicham El Ossmani; Ruth Galdies; Sebastian Grün; Francois Guidet; Anna Hoefges; Cristian Bogdan Iancu; Petra Lotz; Alessandro Maresca; Marion Nagy; Jindrich Novotny; Hajar Rachid; Jessica Rothe; Marguerethe Stenersen; Mishel Stephenson; Alain Stevanovitch; Juliane Strien; Denilce R Sumita; Joanna Vella; Judith Zander
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  Multiplex SNaPshot for detection of BRCA1/2 common mutations in Spanish and Spanish related breast/ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  Sandra Filippini; Ana Blanco; Ana Fernández-Marmiesse; Vanesa Alvarez-Iglesias; Clara Ruíz-Ponte; Angel Carracedo; Ana Vega
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 2.103

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.