Literature DB >> 16243207

Accuracy of emergency medicine ultrasound in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Thomas G Costantino1, Eric C Bruno, Neal Handly, Anthony J Dean.   

Abstract

This study assesses the accuracy of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents in detecting the size and presence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) using EM ultrasound (EUS) compared to radiology measurement (RAD) by computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), angiography, or operative findings. There were 238 aortic EUS performed from 1999-2000; 36 were positive for AAA. The EUS finding of "AAA" had a sensitivity of 0.94 (0.86-1.0 95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity of 1 (0.98-1.0 95% CI). Mean aortic diameter among patients with AAA identified by EUS was 5.43+/-1.95 cm and by RAD was 5.35+/-1.83 cm. The mean absolute difference between EUS and RAD diameters was 4.4 mm (95% CI 3.7-5.5 mm). Regression of EUS on RAD diameters is strongly correlated, with R(2)=0.92. EM residents with appropriate training can accurately determine the presence of AAA as well as the maximal aortic diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243207     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  15 in total

Review 1.  Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Accuracy of emergency department ultrasound scanning in detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  S Bentz; J Jones
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Office-based ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Beau Blois
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta by UK emergency physicians: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  B Dent; R J Kendall; A A Boyle; P R T Atkinson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  The efficacy and value of emergency medicine: a supportive literature review.

Authors:  C James Holliman; Terrence M Mulligan; Robert E Suter; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Philip D Anderson; Kathleen Clem
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-22

5.  Educational assessment of medical student rotation in emergency ultrasound.

Authors:  J Christian Fox; Seric Cusick; William Scruggs; Travis W Henson; Craig L Anderson; Graciela Barajas; Alexander Zlidenny; Joanne McDonough; Mark I Langdorf
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08

6.  Point-of-care ultrasound induced changes in management of unselected patients in the emergency department - a prospective single-blinded observational trial.

Authors:  Jesper Weile; Christian A Frederiksen; Christian B Laursen; Ole Graumann; Erik Sloth; Hans Kirkegaard
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Bedside ultrasound in resuscitation and the rapid ultrasound in shock protocol.

Authors:  Dina Seif; Phillips Perera; Thomas Mailhot; David Riley; Diku Mandavia
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-24

8.  Point-of-care Ultrasound to Identify Distal Ulnar Artery Thrombosis: Case of Hypothenar Hammer Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan Ken; Darshan Khangura; Sean P Stickles
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-02

9.  Novices may be trained to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysms using ultrasound.

Authors:  Anh T V Nguyen; Geraldine B Hill; Matthew P T Versteeg; Ian A Thomson; Andre M van Rij
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on clinical decision-making at an urban emergency department in Tanzania.

Authors:  Teri Ann Reynolds; Stas Amato; Irene Kulola; Chuan-Jay Jeffrey Chen; Juma Mfinanga; Hendry Robert Sawe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.