Literature DB >> 16242391

Structural adaptations to bone loss in aging men and women.

Cosimo Roberto Russo1, Fulvio Lauretani, Ego Seeman, Benedetta Bartali, Stefania Bandinelli, Angelo Di Iorio, Jack Guralnik, Luigi Ferrucci.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone apposition on the subperiosteal surface and bone loss from the endocortical surface during aging establish the external diameter, total cross-sectional area (tCSA), cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and the distance the cortex is placed from the neutral axis of a long bone, all determinants of bone strength. We tested the hypothesis that sex-related differences in these processes produces a sexual dimorphism in tibial fragility.
METHODS: The above traits were assessed in 688 women and 561 men (20-102 years old) using peripheral QCT.
RESULTS: Total and medullary areas were greater in young adult men than young adult women. As age advanced, in men, tCSA area increased by 0.79 SD, and medullary area increased by 0.54 SD so that cortical area, cortical thickness and minimum and maximum moments of inertia (Imin and Imax) were similar at all ages. In women, tCSA increased by 0.2 SD, while medullary area increased by 2.6 SD so that cortical area and thickness and the moments of inertia diminished. Cortical apparent volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) declined more in women (by 3.1 SD) than men (by 0.5 SD). In both sexes, the lower the cortical apparent vBMD, the higher the tCSA (women R2 = 0.13, men R2 = 0.16, both P < 0.0001), whereas the lower the Ct.Th, the lower the tCSA (women R2 = 0.30, men R2 = 0.32, both P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Bone loss reduces cortical thickness and increases intracortical porosity. These changes tend to be compensated for by periosteal apposition in both sexes but more greatly in men than in women, perhaps because this mechanism may be ineffective when cortical thinning is severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16242391     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  44 in total

1.  Relationship between bone cross-sectional area and indices of peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Claudio Pedone; Simone Scarlata; Nicola Napoli; Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  The amount of periosteal apposition required to maintain bone strength during aging depends on adult bone morphology and tissue-modulus degradation rate.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The relative importance of genetics and phenotypic plasticity in dictating bone morphology and mechanics in aged mice: evidence from an artificial selection experiment.

Authors:  Kevin M Middleton; Corinne E Shubin; Douglas C Moore; Patrick A Carter; Theodore Garland; Sharon M Swartz
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The impact of accurate positioning on measurements made by peripheral QCT in the distal radius.

Authors:  E J Marjanovic; K A Ward; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effect of monthly ibandronate on hip structural geometry in men with low bone density.

Authors:  H K Genant; E M Lewiecki; T Fuerst; M Fries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Proinflammatory cytokines and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert R McLean
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  External Bone Size Is a Key Determinant of Strength-Decline Trajectories of Aging Male Radii.

Authors:  Erin Mr Bigelow; Daniella M Patton; Ferrous S Ward; Antonio Ciarelli; Michael Casden; Andrea Clark; Robert W Goulet; Michael D Morris; Stephen H Schlecht; Gurjit S Mandair; Todd L Bredbenner; David H Kohn; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Longitudinal changes in BMD and bone geometry in a population-based study.

Authors:  Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Michael E Griswold; Marcello Maggio; Richard Semba; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.