Literature DB >> 16242226

In silico screening of chemicals for bacterial mutagenicity using electrotopological E-state indices and MDL QSAR software.

Joseph F Contrera1, Edwin J Matthews, Naomi L Kruhlak, R Daniel Benz.   

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) software offers a rapid, cost effective means of prioritizing the mutagenic potential of chemicals. MDL QSAR models were developed using atom-type E-state indices and non-parametric discriminant analysis. Models were developed for Salmonella typhimurium gene mutation, combining results from strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1536, TA1537, and TA1538 (n=3228), and Escherichia coli gene mutation tests WP2, WP100, and polA (n=472). Composite microbial mutation models (n=3338) were developed combining all Salmonella, E. coli, and the Bacillus subtilis rec spot test study results. The datasets contained 74% non-pharmaceuticals and 26% pharmaceuticals. Salmonella and microbial mutagenesis external validation studies included a total of 1444 and 1485 compounds, respectively. The average specificity, sensitivity, positive predictivity, concordance, and coverage of Salmonella models was 76, 81, 73, 78, and 98%, respectively, with similar performance for the microbial mutagenesis models. MDL QSAR and discriminant analysis provides rapid and highly automated mutagenicity screening software with good specificity, sensitivity, and coverage that is simpler and requires less user intervention than other similar software. MDL QSAR modules for microbial mutagenicity can provide efficient and cost effective large scale screening of compounds for mutagenic potential for the chemical and pharmaceutical industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16242226     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.

Authors:  Sandeep Modi; Jin Li; Sophie Malcomber; Claire Moore; Andrew Scott; Andrew White; Paul Carmichael
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Fungal bis-Naphthopyrones as Inhibitors of Botulinum Neurotoxin Serotype A.

Authors:  John H Cardellina; Virginia I Roxas-Duncan; Vicki Montgomery; Vanessa Eccard; Yvette Campbell; Xin Hu; Ilja Khavrutskii; Gregory J Tawa; Anders Wallqvist; James B Gloer; Nisarga L Phatak; Ulrich Höller; Ashish G Soman; Biren K Joshi; Sara M Hein; Donald T Wicklow; Leonard A Smith
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 3.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.

Authors:  Curran Landry; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Kevin P Cross; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  A Toxicity Prediction Tool for Potential Agonist/Antagonist Activities in Molecular Initiating Events Based on Chemical Structures.

Authors:  Kota Kurosaki; Raymond Wu; Yoshihiro Uesawa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.