Literature DB >> 16240820

Contribution of harmonicity and location to auditory object formation in free field: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Kelly L McDonald1, Claude Alain.   

Abstract

The contribution of location and harmonicity cues in sound segregation was investigated using behavioral reports and source waveforms derived from the scalp-recorded evoked potentials. Participants were presented with sounds composed of multiple harmonics in a free-field environment. The third harmonic was either tuned or mistuned and could be presented from the same or different location from the remaining harmonics. Presenting the third harmonic at a different location than the remaining harmonics increased the likelihood of hearing the tuned or slightly (i.e., 2%) mistuned harmonic as a separate object. Partials mistuned by 16% of their original value "pop out" of the complex and were paralleled by an object-related negativity (ORN) that superimposed the N1 and P2 components. For the 2% mistuned stimuli, the ORN was present only when the mistuned harmonic was presented at a different location than the remaining harmonics. Presenting the tuned harmonic at a different location also yielded changes in neural activity between 150 and 250 ms after sound onset. The behavioral and electrophysiological results indicate that listeners can segregate sounds based on harmonicity or location alone. The results also indicate that a conjunction of harmonicity and location cues contribute to sound segregation primarily when harmonicity is ambiguous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240820     DOI: 10.1121/1.2000747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The effects of aging on auditory cortical function.

Authors:  Gregg Recanzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Brain bases for auditory stimulus-driven figure-ground segregation.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Maria Chait; Sukhbinder Kumar; Katharina von Kriegstein; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  N2ac: an ERP component associated with the focusing of attention within an auditory scene.

Authors:  Marissa L Gamble; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Perception and cortical neural coding of harmonic fusion in ferrets.

Authors:  Sridhar Kalluri; Didier A Depireux; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Amy S Joh; Rachel E Keen; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

9.  Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Aurelie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.