Literature DB >> 16240095

AMBER force-field parameters for phosphorylated amino acids in different protonation states: phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine, and phosphohistidine.

Nadine Homeyer1, Anselm H C Horn, Harald Lanig, Heinrich Sticht.   

Abstract

We report a consistent set of AMBER force-field parameters for the most common phosphorylated amino acids, phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine, and phosphohistidine in different protonation states. The calculation of atomic charges followed the original restrained electrostatic potential fitting procedure used to determine the charges for the parm94/99 parameter set, taking alpha-helical and beta-strand conformations of the corresponding ACE-/NME-capped model peptide backbone into account. Missing force-field parameters were taken directly from the general AMBER force field (gaff) and the parm99 data set with minor modifications, or were newly generated based on ab initio calculations for model systems. Final parameters were validated by geometry optimizations and molecular-dynamics simulations. Template libraries for the phosphorylated amino acids in Leap format and corresponding frcmod parameter files are made available. [Figure: see text].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240095     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-005-0028-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  12 in total

1.  The origins of protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  Philip Cohen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Development of the force field parameters for phosphoimidazole and phosphohistidine.

Authors:  Yuri A Kosinsky; Pavel E Volynsky; Philippe Lagant; Gerard Vergoten; Ei-Ichiro Suzuki; Alexander S Arseniev; Roman G Efremov
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; P Cieplak; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1999-02

5.  Random-coil chemical shifts of phosphorylated amino acids.

Authors:  E A Bienkiewicz; K J Lumb
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Molecular modeling of the catalytic domain of serine/threonine phosphatase-1 with the Zn2+ and Mn2+ di-nuclear ion centers in the active site.

Authors:  E Wozniak; S Ołdziej; J Ciarkowski
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  2000-05

Review 7.  Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of histidine residues in proteins.

Authors:  Susanne Klumpp; Josef Krieglstein
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2002-02

8.  Direct effects of phosphorylation on the preferred backbone conformation of peptides: a nuclear magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  A Tholey; A Lindemann; V Kinzel; J Reed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field.

Authors:  Kristin L Meagher; Luke T Redman; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 10.  Global control of sugar metabolism: a gram-positive solution.

Authors:  Fritz Titgemeyer; Wolfgang Hillen
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

View more
  122 in total

1.  Effect of the SH3-SH2 domain linker sequence on the structure of Hck kinase.

Authors:  Heike Meiselbach; Heinrich Sticht
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Analysis of the bacterial luciferase mobile loop by replica-exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Zachary T Campbell; Thomas O Baldwin; Osamu Miyashita
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Molecular Basis for Phosphorylation-dependent SUMO Recognition by the DNA Repair Protein RAP80.

Authors:  Leo Spyracopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Dynamic architecture of a protein kinase.

Authors:  Christopher L McClendon; Alexandr P Kornev; Michael K Gilson; Susan S Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multipole electrostatic potential derived atomic charges in NDDO-methods with spd-basis sets.

Authors:  Anselm H C Horn; Timothy Clark
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Mechanism of β-arrestin recruitment by the μ-opioid G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Amirhossein Mafi; Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Deprotonation states of the two active site water molecules regulate the binding of protein phosphatase 5 with its substrate: A molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Lingyun Wang; Feng Yan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Src binds cortactin through an SH2 domain cystine-mediated linkage.

Authors:  Jason V Evans; Amanda G Ammer; John E Jett; Chris A Bolcato; Jason C Breaux; Karen H Martin; Mark V Culp; Peter M Gannett; Scott A Weed
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7)-mediated phosphorylation of the CDK9 activation loop promotes P-TEFb assembly with Tat and proviral HIV reactivation.

Authors:  Uri Mbonye; Benlian Wang; Giridharan Gokulrangan; Wuxian Shi; Sichun Yang; Jonathan Karn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Hierarchical modeling of activation mechanisms in the ABL and EGFR kinase domains: thermodynamic and mechanistic catalysts of kinase activation by cancer mutations.

Authors:  Anshuman Dixit; Gennady M Verkhivker
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.