Literature DB >> 16239231

Patients' preference for administration of endocrine treatments by injection or tablets: results from a study of women with breast cancer.

L Fallowfield1, L Atkins, S Catt, A Cox, C Coxon, C Langridge, R Morris, M Price.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapies for advanced breast cancer include tablets and intramuscular injections. When treatments have similar efficacy and tolerability profiles, addressing preferences about routes of administration is important. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eight women>2 years post-breast cancer diagnosis were interviewed about their preferences for daily tablets or monthly intramuscular injections. Health-care professionals treating the women estimated patients' preferences.
RESULTS: Sixty-three per cent of patients preferred tablets, 24.5% preferred the injection and 12.5% had no preference. The most cited reasons for tablet preference were convenience and dislike of needles; for injection preference, adherence and convenience. Variables associated with preferences were body mass index, educational level, attitudes towards injections and efficacy perceptions. Estimates about patients' preferences by health-care professionals varied widely. When asked to imagine scenarios where injections produced fewer hot flushes, or where two injections monthly improved efficacy, injection preference increased to 60.6% and 74.5%, respectively. Disturbingly, approximately 50% of patients admitted they sometimes forgot or chose not to take their current oral medication.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of breast cancer patients preferred hormone therapy via daily tablets rather than monthly injections. Information about side-effects or improved efficacy altered these preferences. Adherence to treatment cannot be assumed; patients' preferences about drug administration may influence this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239231     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  43 in total

1.  Are the colors and shapes of current psychotropics designed to maximize the placebo response?

Authors:  Arif Khan; Eswara Prasad Bomminayuni; Amritha Bhat; James Faucett; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Trends in endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a focus on the premenopausal patient.

Authors:  W Jonat; K I Pritchard; R Sainsbury; J G Klijn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The ethics of complementary therapy research recruitment: a case study.

Authors:  Fiona Barlow; George Lewith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Methotrexate: underused and ignored?

Authors:  Hans H Herfarth; Millie D Long; Kim L Isaacs
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.404

5.  Symptom Map of Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Yehui Zhu; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Catherine M Bender
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  An ingestible self-orienting system for oral delivery of macromolecules.

Authors:  Alex Abramson; Ester Caffarel-Salvador; Minsoo Khang; David Dellal; David Silverstein; Yuan Gao; Morten Revsgaard Frederiksen; Andreas Vegge; František Hubálek; Jorrit J Water; Anders V Friderichsen; Johannes Fels; Rikke Kaae Kirk; Cody Cleveland; Joy Collins; Siddartha Tamang; Alison Hayward; Tomas Landh; Stephen T Buckley; Niclas Roxhed; Ulrik Rahbek; Robert Langer; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Optimizing the benefit of multiple sclerosis therapy: the importance of treatment adherence.

Authors:  Francesco Patti
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Emerging oral treatments in multiple sclerosis - clinical utility of cladribine tablets.

Authors:  Claudio Gasperini; Serena Ruggieri; Carlo Pozzilli
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Impact of SERM adherence on treatment effect: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials 13-93 and 14-93.

Authors:  Olivia Pagani; Shari Gelber; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Edda Simoncini
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Economic evaluation of fulvestrant as an extra step in the treatment sequence for ER-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Cameron; D R Camidge; J Oyee; M Hirsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.