Literature DB >> 16238608

Tissue engineering of bone: search for a better scaffold.

M Mastrogiacomo1, A Muraglia, V Komlev, F Peyrin, F Rustichelli, A Crovace, R Cancedda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large bone defects still represent a major problem in orthopedics. Traditional bone-repair treatments can be divided into two groups: the bone transport (Ilizarov technology) and the graft transplant (autologous or allogeneic bone grafts). Thus far, none of these strategies have proven to be always resolving. As an alternative, a tissue engineering approach has been proposed where osteogenic cells, bioceramic scaffolds, growth factors and physical forces concur to the bone defect repair. Different sources of osteoprogenitor cells have been suggested, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) being in most cases the first choice. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In association with mineral tridimensional scaffolds, BMSC form a primary bone tissue which is highly vascularized and colonized by host hemopoietic marrow. The chemical composition of the scaffold is crucial for the osteoconductive properties and the resorbability of the material. In addition, scaffolds should have an internal structure permissive for vascular invasion. Porous bioceramics [hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate] are osteoconductive and are particularly advantageous for bone tissue engineering application as they induce neither an immune nor an inflammatory response in the implanted host. Earlier, we first reported a cell-based tissue engineering procedure to treat three patients with long bone segmental defects. Cells were loaded on a 100% HA porous ceramic. These scaffolds proved to have good osteoconductive properties resulting in a good functional recovery, but they have not been resorbed after more than 5 years from the implant. In addition, due to the high density of the mineral and the relatively low porosity (50-60%), it was very difficult to monitor the patient recovery during the post-surgery time using X-rays.
CONCLUSIONS: We report here some pre-clinical testing of new scaffolds. To compare these second generation ceramic scaffolds more suitable for a tissue engineering approach we had to first establish animal models and analysis procedures including the use of X-ray-computed microtomography associated with X-rays synchroton radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16238608     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2005.00350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  43 in total

1.  Evaluation of colloidal silica suspension as efficient additive for improving physicochemical and in vitro biological properties of calcium sulfate-based nanocomposite bone cement.

Authors:  Shokoufeh Borhan; Saeed Hesaraki; Shaghayegh Ahmadzadeh-Asl
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Preparation of a novel biodegradable nanocomposite scaffold based on poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/bioglass nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hadi Hajiali; Saeed Karbasi; Mohammad Hosseinalipour; Hamid Reza Rezaie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) growth and adhesion in six different bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  J Schultheiss; C Seebach; D Henrich; K Wilhelm; J H Barker; J Frank
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Tailor-made tricalcium phosphate bone implant directly fabricated by a three-dimensional ink-jet printer.

Authors:  Kazuyo Igawa; Manabu Mochizuki; Osamu Sugimori; Koutaro Shimizu; Kenji Yamazawa; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Takato; Ryouhei Nishimura; Shigeki Suzuki; Masahiro Anzai; Ung-il Chung; Nobuo Sasaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Clinical application of artificial bone in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Hideto Saijo; Ung-il Chung; Kazuyo Igawa; Yoshiyuki Mori; Daichi Chikazu; Mitsuyoshi Iino; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Mesoporous bioactive glasses: structure characteristics, drug/growth factor delivery and bone regeneration application.

Authors:  Chengtie Wu; Jiang Chang
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 7.  [Resorbable bone substitution materials: An overview of commercially available materials and new approaches in the field of composites].

Authors:  S Heinemann; M Gelinsky; H Worch; T Hanke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The use of total human bone marrow fraction in a direct three-dimensional expansion approach for bone tissue engineering applications: focus on angiogenesis and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Julien Guerrero; Hugo Oliveira; Sylvain Catros; Robin Siadous; Sidi-Mohammed Derkaoui; Reine Bareille; Didier Letourneur; Joëlle Amédée
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  In vivo bone formation by progeny of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sergei A Kuznetsov; Natasha Cherman; Pamela Gehron Robey
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  Major bone defect treatment with an osteoconductive bone substitute.

Authors:  Stefania Paderni; S Terzi; L Amendola
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.