Literature DB >> 19184280

Clinical application of artificial bone in the maxillofacial region.

Hideto Saijo1, Ung-il Chung, Kazuyo Igawa, Yoshiyuki Mori, Daichi Chikazu, Mitsuyoshi Iino, Tsuyoshi Takato.   

Abstract

Hard tissue reconstruction is very useful for bony defects of the maxillofacial region. Autogenous bone, allogeneic bone, and artificial bone have been used to reconstruct maxillofacial bone; however, the use of autogenous bone involves high surgical invasiveness because of the need to harvest the bone. The use of allogeneic bone is associated with infections, raises ethical concerns, and is not widely used in Japan. Artificial bone has several advantages, including no need for bone harvesting, excellent biocompatibility, and a relatively easy surgical procedure. Use of artificial bone avoids the much greater invasiveness of harvesting bone, and several types of artificial bone have been developed. Design requirements for artificial bone include surgical manipulability, structural compatibility with the defective area, support properties, and the ability to induce bone regeneration; however, no artificial bone meeting all these requirements has yet been developed. Artificial bone is used in many patients in our medical center, and we have been active in developing the next generation of artificial bone with better properties. In this article, we present a case history and discuss the future development of artificial bone for use in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19184280     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-008-0425-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  15 in total

1.  Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes--tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  P Tessier; H Kawamoto; D Matthews; J Posnick; Y Raulo; J F Tulasne; S A Wolfe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defects.

Authors:  E Heissler; F S Fischer; S Bolouri; T Lehmann; W Mathar; A Gebhardt; W Lanksch; J Bier
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue.

Authors:  M Hallman; S Lundgren; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Preshaped hydroxyapatite tricalcium-phosphate implant using three-dimensional computed tomography in the reconstruction of bone deformities of craniomaxillofacial region.

Authors:  Hideyuki Tada; Mitsuo Hatoko; Aya Tanaka; Masamitsu Kuwahara; Kumi Mashiba; Satoshi Yurugi; Hiroshi Iioka; Katsunori Niitsuma
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Tailor-made orbitocranioplasty for a sphenorbital encephalocele presenting as pulsatile exophthalmos. Case report.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Katano; Noritaka Aihara; Yotaro Takeuchi; Miho Nozaki; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Comparison of 2 methods of making surgical models for correction of facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Tung-Yiu Wong; Jing-Jing Fang; Ching-Hung Chung; Jehn-Shyun Huang; Jing-Wei Lee
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: I. Experimental results from a new quick-setting material.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Treatment of extensive cranial bone defects using computer-designed hydroxyapatite ceramics and periosteal flaps.

Authors:  I Ono; H Gunji; F Kaneko; S Numazawa; N Kodama; S Yoza
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Comparison of the effects of added alpha- and beta- tricalcium phosphate on the basic properties of apatite cement.

Authors:  Akinari Nakagawa; Shigeki Matsuya; Akari Takeuchi; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Craniofacial reconstruction with computer-generated HTR patient-matched implants: use in primary bony tumor excision.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2008: the year in review.

Authors:  Y Sawa; E Tatsumi; A Funakubo; T Horiuchi; K Iwasaki; A Kishida; T Masuzawa; K Matsuda; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; Y Tomizawa; T Yamaoka; H Watanabe
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Clinical experience of full custom-made artificial bones for the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Hideto Saijo; Yuko Fujihara; Yuki Kanno; Kazuto Hoshi; Atsuhiko Hikita; Ung-Il Chung; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.419

3.  Computed tomographic evaluation of novel custom-made artificial bones, "CT-bone", applied for maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuki Kanno; Takashi Nakatsuka; Hideto Saijo; Yuko Fujihara; Hikita Atsuhiko; Ung-Il Chung; Tsuyoshi Takato; Kazuto Hoshi
Journal:  Regen Ther       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.419

4.  Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nanostructured Carbonated Hydroxyapatite for Alveolar Bone Repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo F B Resende; Suelen C Sartoretto; Marcelo J Uzeda; Adriana T N N Alves; José A Calasans-Maia; Alexandre M Rossi; José Mauro Granjeiro; Mônica D Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.