Literature DB >> 16237344

Discrepancy between feedback negativity and subjective evaluation in gambling.

Atsuhito Toyomaki1, Harumitsu Murohashi.   

Abstract

Feedback negativity is a negative event-related potential elicited by feedback indicating incorrect performance or monetary loss. It is unclear whether this negativity is elicited by neutral feedback (e.g. a draw in gambling) or is affected by the subjective rating of punishment. To investigate these issues, we performed a modified and computerized game of 'rock-paper-scissors' as a gambling task and measured feedback negativity in response to feedback indicating the outcome, which was accompanied by a monetary reward. The data demonstrated that feedback negativity was elicited not only by a monetary loss but also by an even outcome and was independent of the magnitude of monetary loss. Our results suggest feedback negativity is not always specific to both monetary loss and subjective rating of punishment.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16237344     DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000185962.96217.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  18 in total

Review 1.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Theta oscillations during the processing of monetary loss and gain: a perspective on gender and impulsivity.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Madhavi Rangaswamy; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Yongqiang Tang; Ashwini K Pandey; Bangalore N Roopesh; Arthur T Stimus; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Binary sensitivity of theta activity for gain and loss when monitoring parametric prediction errors.

Authors:  Denise J C Janssen; Edita Poljac; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.

Authors:  Elena Krugliakova; Vasily Klucharev; Tommaso Fedele; Alexey Gorin; Aleksandra Kuznetsova; Anna Shestakova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Topography, power, and current source density of θ oscillations during reward processing as markers for alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Niklas Manz; David B Chorlian; Ashwini K Pandey; Bangalore N Roopesh; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Lance O Bauer; Victor M Hesselbrock; Marc A Schuckit; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Brain signatures of monetary loss and gain: outcome-related potentials in a single outcome gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Yongqiang Tang; David B Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Ramotse Saunders; Ashwini K Pandey; Bangalore N Roopesh; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Understanding alcohol use disorders with neuroelectrophysiology.

Authors:  Madhavi Rangaswamy; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2014

9.  Dysfunctional reward processing in male alcoholics: an ERP study during a gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Yongqiang Tang; David B Chorlian; Ashwini K Pandey; Bangalore N Roopesh; Niklas Manz; Ramotse Saunders; Arthur T Stimus; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Neural correlates of feedback processing in decision-making under risk.

Authors:  Beate Schuermann; Tanja Endrass; Norbert Kathmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.