Literature DB >> 16237250

Response, thermal regulatory threshold and thermal breakdown threshold of restrained RF-exposed mice at 905 MHz.

S Ebert1, S J Eom, J Schuderer, U Apostel, T Tillmann, C Dasenbrock, N Kuster.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was the determination of the thermal regulatory and the thermal breakdown thresholds for in-tube restrained B6C3F1 and NMRI mice exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at 905 MHz. Different levels of the whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR = 0, 2, 5, 7.2, 10, 12.6 and 20 W kg(-1)) have been applied to the mice inside the 'Ferris Wheel' exposure setup at 22 +/- 2 degrees C and 30-70% humidity. The thermal responses were assessed by measurement of the rectal temperature prior, during and after the 2 h exposure session. For B6C3F1 mice, the thermal response was examined for three different weight groups (20 g, 24 g, 29 g), both genders and for pregnant mice. Additionally, NMRI mice with a weight of 36 g were investigated for an interstrain comparison. The thermal regulatory threshold of in-tube restrained mice was found at SAR levels between 2 W kg(-1) and 5 W kg(-1), whereas the breakdown of regulation was determined at 10.1 +/- 4.0 W kg(-1)(K = 2) for B6C3F1 mice and 7.7 +/- 1.6 W kg(-1)(K = 2) for NMRI mice. Based on a simplified power balance equation, the thresholds show a clear dependence upon the metabolic rate and weight. NMRI mice were more sensitive to thermal stress and respond at lower SAR values with regulation and breakdown. The presented data suggest that the thermal breakdown for in-tube restrained mice, whole-body exposed to radiofrequency fields, may occur at SAR levels of 6 W kg(-1)(K = 2) at laboratory conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16237250     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/21/017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  A Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure System for Rodents based on Reverberation Chambers.

Authors:  Myles Capstick; Niels Kuster; Sven Kuehn; Veronica Berdinas-Torres; Yijian Gong; Perry Wilson; John Ladbury; Galen Koepke; David L McCormick; James Gauger; Ronald L Melnick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.006

2.  Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Claudia Consales; Caterina Merla; Carmela Marino; Barbara Benassi
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-09-09

Review 3.  Workgroup report: base stations and wireless networks-radiofrequency (RF) exposures and health consequences.

Authors:  Peter A Valberg; T Emilie van Deventer; Michael H Repacholi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Thermoregulatory Stress as Potential Mediating Factor in the NTP Cell Phone Tumor Study.

Authors:  Jens Kuhne; Janine-Alison Schmidt; Dirk Geschwentner; Blanka Pophof; Gunde Ziegelberger
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.010

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.