Literature DB >> 16237171

Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic.

Heidi Hofer1, Joseph Carroll, Jay Neitz, Maureen Neitz, David R Williams.   

Abstract

Using high-resolution adaptive-optics imaging combined with retinal densitometry, we characterized the arrangement of short- (S), middle- (M), and long- (L) wavelength-sensitive cones in eight human foveal mosaics. As suggested by previous studies, we found males with normal color vision that varied in the ratio of L to M cones (from 1.1:1 to 16.5:1). We also found a protan carrier with an even more extreme L:M ratio (0.37:1). All subjects had nearly identical S-cone densities, indicating independence of the developmental mechanism that governs the relative numerosity of L/M and S cones. L:M cone ratio estimates were correlated highly with those obtained in the same eyes using the flicker photometric electroretinogram (ERG), although the comparison indicates that the signal from each M cone makes a larger contribution to the ERG than each L cone. Although all subjects had highly disordered arrangements of L and M cones, three subjects showed evidence for departures from a strictly random rule for assigning the L and M cone photopigments. In two retinas, these departures corresponded to local clumping of cones of like type. In a third retina, the L:M cone ratio differed significantly at two retinal locations on opposite sides of the fovea. These results suggest that the assignment of L and M pigment, although highly irregular, is not a completely random process. Surprisingly, in the protan carrier, in which X-chromosome inactivation would favor L- or M-cone clumping, there was no evidence of clumping, perhaps as a result of cone migration during foveal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16237171      PMCID: PMC6725723          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2414-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  137 in total

1.  Vision: Neurons show their true colours.

Authors:  Jonathan B Demb; David H Brainard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Single cell imaging of the chick retina with adaptive optics.

Authors:  Kenneth Headington; Stacey S Choi; Debora Nickla; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  The Role of X-Chromosome Inactivation in Retinal Development and Disease.

Authors:  Abigail T Fahim; Stephen P Daiger
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  An urn model of the development of L/M cone ratios in human and macaque retinas.

Authors:  Kenneth Knoblauch; Maureen Neitz; Jay Neitz
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Horizontal cell feedback without cone type-selective inhibition mediates "red-green" color opponency in midget ganglion cells of the primate retina.

Authors:  Joanna D Crook; Michael B Manookin; Orin S Packer; Dennis M Dacey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Suguru Shirato; Muneyoshi Kaneko; Beth I Digby; John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera.

Authors:  Bai Xue; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 8.  Neural models and physiological reality.

Authors:  Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  The L:M cone ratio in males of African descent with normal color vision.

Authors:  Carrie McMahon; Joseph Carroll; Stella Awua; Jay Neitz; Maureen Neitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Simultaneous chromatic and luminance human electroretinogram responses.

Authors:  Neil R A Parry; Ian J Murray; Athanasios Panorgias; Declan J McKeefry; Barry B Lee; Jan Kremers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.