Literature DB >> 16236888

Tumor size is a determinant of stage distribution in t1 non-small cell lung cancer.

Douglas B Flieder1, Jeffrey L Port, Robert J Korst, Paul J Christos, Matthew A Levin, David E Becker, Nasser K Altorki.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Despite renewed interest in early detection of lung cancer, the relationship between tumor size and survival remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between size and stage in patients with T1 (< or = 3.0 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a lung cancer database from 1995 to 2003 identified 503 patients with completely resected invasive NSCLC with tumors < or = 3 cm. All clinical and pathologic characteristics were recorded. Univariate associations between nodal status and other prognostic factors were explored by chi2 and t tests. The independent effect of tumor size > 2 cm vs < or = 2 cm on the risk of nodal disease was analyzed using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Of the 503 patients, 324 patients (64.4%) had stage IA disease, 52 patients (10.3%) had stage IB disease, 37 patients (7.4%) had stage IIA disease, 15 patients (3%) had stage IIB disease, 43 patients (8.6%) had stage IIIA disease, 24 patients (4.8%) had stage IIIB disease, and 8 patients (1.6%) had stage IV disease. One hundred patients (19.9%) had nodal metastases. The mean (+/- SD) tumor size of cases without nodal disease was 1.90 +/- 0.67 cm, compared to 2.18 +/- 0.69 cm for node-positive tumors (p = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval [CI] for mean difference, 0.13 to 0.43). Forty-eight of 308 patients (15.6%) with smaller carcinomas (< or = 2.0 cm) compared to 52 of 195 patients (26.7%) with carcinomas > 2.0 cm had nodal metastases (p = 0.002). Exploratory multivariate analysis revealed that only tumor size (< or = 2.0 cm [referent] vs > 2.0 cm) affected nodal status and thus stage (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.1; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Primary invasive NSCLC > 2.0 cm was twice as likely to have nodal metastases than carcinomas < or = 2.0 cm. Our results suggest that in lung cancer smaller lesions may represent earlier stage disease. These results also suggest the need for further subclassification by tumor size within the current International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I, with tumors < 2 cm in size contained in a separate substage. This refinement may help to better clarify which patients might benefit from novel adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16236888     DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  11 in total

1.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Muralikrishna Gopal; Shaad E Abdullah; James J Grady; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Relationship between tumor size and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) registry.

Authors:  Jianjun Zhang; Kathryn A Gold; Heather Y Lin; Stephen G Swisher; Yan Xing; J Jack Lee; Edward S Kim; William N William
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  New potential for enhancing concomitant chemoradiotherapy with FDA approved concentrations of cisplatin via the photoelectric effect.

Authors:  Yucel Altundal; Gizem Cifter; Alexandre Detappe; Erno Sajo; Panagiotis Tsiamas; Piotr Zygmanski; Ross Berbeco; Robert A Cormack; Mike Makrigiorgos; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Relationship between tumor size and disease stage in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Fu Yang; Haiquan Chen; Jiaqing Xiang; Yawei Zhang; Jianhua Zhou; Hong Hu; Jie Zhang; Xiaoyang Luo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Screening and chemoprevention in lung cancer.

Authors:  J M Gasent Blesa; E Esteban González; V Alberola Candel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Lung cancer screening with CT.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.878

7.  Tumor volume is more reliable to predict nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer of 3.0 cm or less in the greatest tumor diameter.

Authors:  Bei Jia; Biao Chen; Hao Long; Tiehua Rong; Xiaodong Su
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Factors Associated With Small Aggressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Matthew T Warkentin; Martin C Tammemägi; Matthew T Freedman; Lawrence R Ragard; William G Hocking; Paul A Kvale; Darren R Brenner; Ping Hu; Thomas L Riley; John Commins; Timothy R Church; Christine D Berg
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  FDG PET/CT and mediastinal nodal metastasis detection in stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic implications.

Authors:  Kyung Min Shin; Kyung Soo Lee; Young Mog Shim; Jhingook Kim; Byung Tae Kim; O Jung Kwon; Keunchil Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  The assessment of the role of baseline low-dose CT scan in patients at high risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kołaczyk; Anna Walecka; Tomasz Grodzki; Jacek Alchimowicz; Andrzej Smereczyński; Radosław Kiedrowicz
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.