Literature DB >> 16236402

The effects of yellow fever immunization (17DD) inadvertently used in early pregnancy during a mass campaign in Brazil.

C E S Suzano1, E Amaral, H K Sato, P M Papaiordanou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study describes the consequences of the inadvertent immunization of pregnant women during a mass vaccination campaign in the Campinas region of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in February and March 2000. The study was carried out by the Women's Comprehensive Healthcare Center (CAISM), at the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP). The objective of the study was to evaluate the possible effects of the vaccine on pregnancy and conceptus, and to assess congenital infection resulting from immunization.
METHODS: Pregnant women who received the YF vaccine were identified at primary health clinics and referred to the study site, a public reference, high-risk clinic, serving 42 towns in a region with a population of 3,000,000. A 12-month serological follow-up for newborns (PRNT), and an examination to detect congenital abnormalities was offered to pregnant women, who signed a consent form. In a sub-sample of women who were delivered at the study site, additional exams were proposed: neonatal fontanel ultrasound, funduscopy, audiometry, neuro-pediatric follow-up until 12 months of age, and IgM detection at birth. Fifteen blood samples from placentas and umbilical cords were tested for PCR.
FINDINGS: A total of 480 pregnant, immunized women were identified, who had received the vaccine at a mean of 5.7 weeks (95% CI 5.2-6.2) of gestation. The great majority of women were unaware of their pregnancy at the time they were vaccinated, and only 46.7% were counseled to avoid immunization if pregnant. After a minimum 6-week interval, 98.2% pregnant women were IgG positive. A total of 19.6% of women reported mild adverse events (headache, fever or myalgia). No IgM antibodies were detected at birth and no placental or umbilical cord blood was positive according to PCR. The frequency of malformations (2.3% or 7/304 babies), miscarriages (2.5% or 11/441 pregnancies), stillbirths (0.7%) and premature delivery (7.8%) was similar to that found in the general population. At 12 months follow-up, 7% of samples were reactive to PRNT. However, after 12 months, only one child was seropositive.
INTERPRETATION: Contrary to a previous study, maternal seroconversion was very high when immunization was carried out in early pregnancy. Vaccine applied during the first trimester does not appear to cause malformations, complications to the central nervous system, nor adverse perinatal results as represented by premature deliveries or perinatal deaths. The 12-month serological follow-up is inconclusive and should be extended to 24 months. Evaluation of the risk of miscarriage was hindered by late presentation at the study clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16236402     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  26 in total

Review 1.  The safety of yellow fever vaccine 17D or 17DD in children, pregnant women, HIV+ individuals, and older persons: systematic review.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Diane L Lorenzetti; Wendy Spragins; Dave Jackson; Tyler Williamson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  STATEMENT FOR TRAVELLERS AND YELLOW FEVER: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT).

Authors:  This Statement Was Prepared By P Charlebois
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2013-03-05

3.  STATEMENT ON PREGNANCY AND TRAVEL: Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel.

Authors:  C Beallor
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2010-03-08

4.  Statement for Travellers and Yellow Fever: Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel.

Authors:  P Charlebois
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2010-10-02

Review 5.  Efficacy and duration of immunity after yellow fever vaccination: systematic review on the need for a booster every 10 years.

Authors:  Eduardo Gotuzzo; Sergio Yactayo; Erika Córdova
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 6.  Maternal immunisation to improve the health of HIV-exposed infants.

Authors:  Angela M Bengtson; Alan M Sanfilippo; Brenna L Hughes; David A Savitz
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 25.071

7.  Zika, dengue and yellow fever viruses induce differential anti-viral immune responses in human monocytic and first trimester trophoblast cells.

Authors:  Huanle Luo; Evandro R Winkelmann; Ildefonso Fernandez-Salas; Li Li; Sandra V Mayer; Rogelio Danis-Lozano; Rosa Ma Sanchez-Casas; Nikos Vasilakis; Robert Tesh; Alan D Barrett; Scott C Weaver; Tian Wang
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.970

Review 8.  Yellow Fever in Travelers.

Authors:  Annelies Wilder-Smith
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Yellow Fever Vaccine Safety Perception of Pregnant Women in Emergency Response Mass Vaccination in Uganda.

Authors:  Lena Huebl; Aloysious Nnyombi; Eddy Walakira; Ruth Kutalek
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 10.  Emerging and zoonotic infections in women.

Authors:  Regan N Theiler; Sonja A Rasmussen; Tracee A Treadwell; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.