Literature DB >> 16233574

Quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase is involved in catabolic acetate production, while NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase in ethanol assimilation in Acetobacter pasteurianus SKU1108.

Piyawan Chinnawirotpisan1, Gunjana Theeragool, Savitree Limtong, Hirohide Toyama, Osa O Adachi, Kazunobu Matsushita.   

Abstract

The relationship between quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and NAD-dependent ADH was studied by constructing quinoprotein ADH-deficient mutants. Quinoprotein ADH-deficient mutants were successfully constructed from Acetobacter pasteurianus SKU1108 by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG) mutagenesis and also by adhA gene disruption with a kanamycin cassette. The NTG mutant exhibited a complete loss of its acetate-producing ability and acetic acid resistance, while the disruptant also exhibited a loss of its acetic acid resistance but retained a weak ADH activity. The immunoblot analysis of quinoprotein ADH indicated that there are no appreciable ADH subunits in the membranes of both mutant strains. The NTG mutant grew better than the wild-type strain in ethanol-containing medium, despite the absence of quinoprotein ADH. In the mutant, the activities of two NAD-dependent ADHs, present in a small amount in the wild-type strain, markedly increased in the cytoplasm when cultured in a medium containing ethanol, concomitant to the increase in the activities of the key enzymes in TCA and glyoxylate cycles. The disruptant showed a poorer growth than the wild-type strain, producing a lower amount of acetic acid in ethanol culture, and it induced one of the two NAD-dependent ADHs and some of the acetate-assimilating enzymes induced in the NTG mutant. This study clearly showed that quinoprotein ADH is extensively involved in acetic acid production, while NAD-dependent ADH only in ethanol assimilation through the TCA and glyoxylate cycles in acetic acid bacteria. The differences between the NTG mutant and the disruptant are also discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 16233574     DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1723(04)70150-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng        ISSN: 1347-4421            Impact factor:   2.894


  12 in total

1.  Putative ABC transporter responsible for acetic acid resistance in Acetobacter aceti.

Authors:  Shigeru Nakano; Masahiro Fukaya; Sueharu Horinouchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Acetobacter aceti possesses a proton motive force-dependent efflux system for acetic acid.

Authors:  Kazunobu Matsushita; Taketo Inoue; Osao Adachi; Hirohide Toyama
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Characterization of enzymes in the oxidation of 1,2-propanediol to D: -(-)-lactic acid by Gluconobacter oxydans DSM 2003.

Authors:  Liujing Wei; Xuepeng Yang; Keliang Gao; Jinping Lin; Shengli Yang; Qiang Hua; Dongzhi Wei
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 4.  Overview on mechanisms of acetic acid resistance in acetic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Yanchun Shao; Fusheng Chen
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Simultaneous vinegar fermentation from a pineapple by-product using the co-inoculation of yeast and thermotolerant acetic acid bacteria and their physiochemical properties.

Authors:  Varavut Tanamool; Mallika Chantarangsee; Wichai Soemphol
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  The key to acetate: metabolic fluxes of acetic acid bacteria under cocoa pulp fermentation-simulating conditions.

Authors:  Philipp Adler; Lasse Jannis Frey; Antje Berger; Christoph Josef Bolten; Carl Erik Hansen; Christoph Wittmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors.

Authors:  Peter D Newell; John M Chaston; Yiping Wang; Nathan J Winans; David R Sannino; Adam C N Wong; Adam J Dobson; Jeanne Kagle; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Improving Acetic Acid Production by Over-Expressing PQQ-ADH in Acetobacter pasteurianus.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wu; Hongli Yao; Lili Cao; Zhi Zheng; Xiaoju Chen; Min Zhang; Zhaojun Wei; Jieshun Cheng; Shaotong Jiang; Lijun Pan; Xingjiang Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Classification of acetic acid bacteria and their acid resistant mechanism.

Authors:  Xiaoman Qiu; Yao Zhang; Housheng Hong
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Identification of a five-oxidoreductase-gene cluster from Acetobacter pasteurianus conferring ethanol-dependent acidification in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tamara Garcia-Armisen; Ken Vercammen; Tom Rimaux; Gino Vrancken; Luc De Vuyst; Pierre Cornelis
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.