Literature DB >> 25408687

In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors.

Peter D Newell1, John M Chaston1, Yiping Wang2, Nathan J Winans3, David R Sannino3, Adam C N Wong1, Adam J Dobson1, Jeanne Kagle4, Angela E Douglas5.   

Abstract

Symbiosis is often characterized by co-evolutionary changes in the genomes of the partners involved. An understanding of these changes can provide insight into the nature of the relationship, including the mechanisms that initiate and maintain an association between organisms. In this study we examined the genome sequences of bacteria isolated from the Drosophila melanogaster gut with the objective of identifying genes that are important for function in the host. We compared microbiota isolates with con-specific or closely related bacterial species isolated from non-fly environments. First the phenotype of germ-free Drosophila (axenic flies) was compared to that of flies colonized with specific bacteria (gnotobiotic flies) as a measure of symbiotic function. Non-fly isolates were functionally distinct from bacteria isolated from flies, conferring slower development and an altered nutrient profile in the host, traits known to be microbiota-dependent. Comparative genomic methods were next employed to identify putative symbiosis factors: genes found in bacteria that restore microbiota-dependent traits to gnotobiotic flies, but absent from those that do not. Factors identified include riboflavin synthesis and stress resistance. We also used a phylogenomic approach to identify protein coding genes for which fly-isolate sequences were more similar to each other than to other sequences, reasoning that these genes may have a shared function unique to the fly environment. This method identified genes in Acetobacter species that cluster in two distinct genomic loci: one predicted to be involved in oxidative stress detoxification and another encoding an efflux pump. In summary, we leveraged genomic and in vivo functional comparisons to identify candidate traits that distinguish symbiotic bacteria. These candidates can serve as the basis for further work investigating the genetic requirements of bacteria for function and persistence in the Drosophila gut.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetobacter; Lactobacillus; genome; microbiome; symbiosis

Year:  2014        PMID: 25408687      PMCID: PMC4219406          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


  65 in total

Review 1.  Eating for two: how metabolism establishes interspecies interactions in the gut.

Authors:  Michael A Fischbach; Justin L Sonnenburg
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 2.  Streptococcus adherence and colonization.

Authors:  Angela H Nobbs; Richard J Lamont; Howard F Jenkinson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  J A Eisen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Role of commensal gut bacteria in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Gunnar Loh; Michael Blaut
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-10-11

Review 5.  Multiorganismal insects: diversity and function of resident microorganisms.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  The persistence of a microbial flora during postembryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Bakula
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Intestinal inflammation allows Salmonella to use ethanolamine to compete with the microbiota.

Authors:  Parameth Thiennimitr; Sebastian E Winter; Maria G Winter; Mariana N Xavier; Vladimir Tolstikov; Douglas L Huseby; Torsten Sterzenbach; Renée M Tsolis; John R Roth; Andreas J Bäumler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Jun Lin; Linda Overbye Michel; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment.

Authors:  Fabian Staubach; John F Baines; Sven Künzel; Elisabeth M Bik; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  38 in total

1.  The Host as the Driver of the Microbiota in the Gut and External Environment of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; Yuan Luo; Xiangfeng Jing; Soeren Franzenburg; Alyssa Bost; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A genomic investigation of ecological differentiation between free-living and Drosophila-associated bacteria.

Authors:  Nathan J Winans; Alec Walter; Bessem Chouaia; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas; Peter D Newell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Physiological responses of insects to microbial fermentation products: Insights from the interactions between Drosophila and acetic acid.

Authors:  Geonho Kim; Jia Hsin Huang; John G McMullen; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Comparative Genomic Analysis of Closely Related Acetobacter pasteurianus Strains Provides Evidence of Horizontal Gene Transfer and Reveals Factors Necessary for Thermotolerance.

Authors:  Minenosuke Matsutani; Nami Matsumoto; Hideki Hirakawa; Yuh Shiwa; Hirofumi Yoshikawa; Akiko Okamoto-Kainuma; Morio Ishikawa; Naoya Kataoka; Toshiharu Yakushi; Kazunobu Matsushita
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Gut Microbial Metabolites and Blood Pressure Regulation: Focus on SCFAs and TMAO.

Authors:  Brian G Poll; Muhammad Umar Cheema; Jennifer L Pluznick
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 6.  The impact of metagenomic interplay on the mosquito redox homeostasis.

Authors:  Cody J Champion; Jiannong Xu
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 7.376

7.  Rearing the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster Under Axenic and Gnotobiotic Conditions.

Authors:  Melinda L Koyle; Madeline Veloz; Alec M Judd; Adam C-N Wong; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; John M Chaston
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth.

Authors:  Jessika Consuegra; Théodore Grenier; Patrice Baa-Puyoulet; Isabelle Rahioui; Houssam Akherraz; Hugo Gervais; Nicolas Parisot; Pedro da Silva; Hubert Charles; Federica Calevro; François Leulier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John G McMullen; Grace Peters-Schulze; Jingwei Cai; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Host Genetic Control of the Microbiota Mediates the Drosophila Nutritional Phenotype.

Authors:  John M Chaston; Adam J Dobson; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.