Literature DB >> 16231606

Polycarbonate-urethane hard segment type influences esterase substrate specificity for human-macrophage-mediated biodegradation.

Rosalind S Labow1, Danne Sa, Loren A Matheson, J Paul Santerre.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that esterase activity can degrade a variety of polyurethanes (PUs), including polycarbonate-based PUs (PCNUs). When cultured on PCNUs, differing in their chemistries, monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) synthesized and secreted different amounts of both cholesterol esterase (CE) and monocyte-specific esterase (MSE). MDM were seeded on PCNUs synthesized with hexane diisocyanate (HDI) or 4,4'-methylene-bis-phenyl diisocyanate (MDI), PCN and [14C]butanediol (BD) in the ratio 3:2:1 (referred to as HDI321 or MDI321). The effect of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, a serine esterase and proteinase inhibitor), sodium fluoride (NaF, a MSE inhibitor) and sodium taurocholate (NaT, a CE stimulator) was assessed on degradation (measured by radiolabel release (RR)) and esterase activity in MDM lysate. The results were compared to the effect that these reagents had on commercially available CE and carboxyl esterase (CXE), which has a specificity similar to MSE. NaF inhibited CXE- and MDM-mediated RR to the same extent as for both PCNUs. However, the MDM-mediated RR from MDI321 was 1.8-times higher than HDI321 in the presence of NaT (P = 0.005). This study suggests that the difference in diisocyanate chemistry may dictate the relative contribution of each esterase to a specific material's degradation. This may be related to both the substrate specificity of each esterase, as well as by the relative amount of each esterase that the specific biomaterial substrates induce the cells to synthesize and secrete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16231606     DOI: 10.1163/1568562054798563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  9 in total

1.  Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; James S Wallace; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2011

2.  Strategies for functional bioscaffold-based skeletal muscle reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian M Sicari; Jenna L Dziki; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-10

3.  Susceptibility of a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material to degradation using an agar-well diffusion assay.

Authors:  Noriko Hiraishi; Fernanda T Sadek; Nigel M King; Marco Ferrari; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Modulation of the foreign body reaction for implants in the subcutaneous space: microdialysis probes as localized drug delivery/sampling devices.

Authors:  Xiaodun Mou; Michelle R Lennartz; Daniel J Loegering; Julie A Stenken
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

5.  Dynamic Cellular Adhesion Mediated by Copolymeric Nanofilm Substrates.

Authors:  Eric Shin; Mark Chen; Shiva Daram; Siby Samuel; Suraj Gupta; Erik Robinson; Erik Pierstorff; Dean Ho
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2008-08-01

Review 6.  Immunological reaction to magnesium-based implants for orthopedic applications. What do we know so far? A systematic review on in vivo studies.

Authors:  Omer Suljevic; Stefan F Fischerauer; Annelie M Weinberg; Nicole G Sommer
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-09

7.  Correlating macrophage morphology and cytokine production resulting from biomaterial contact.

Authors:  Hyun-Su Lee; Stanley J Stachelek; Nancy Tomczyk; Matthew J Finley; Russell J Composto; David M Eckmann
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials.

Authors:  Zeeshan Sheikh; Patricia J Brooks; Oriyah Barzilay; Noah Fine; Michael Glogauer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Endometrial Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Modulate the Macrophage Response to Implanted Polyamide/Gelatin Composite Mesh in Immunocompromised and Immunocompetent Mice.

Authors:  S Darzi; J A Deane; C A Nold; S E Edwards; D J Gough; S Mukherjee; S Gurung; K S Tan; A V Vashi; J A Werkmeister; C E Gargett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.