S B Angleman1, T B Harris, D Melzer. 1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK. anglemas@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To measure the risk of periretirement age disability associated with five different anthropometric measures of body mass and shape, and to compare the measures in this group, the peak age group of obesity prevalence. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of Health Survey for England 1998 respondents followed-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing in 2002. SUBJECTS: National population sample of 1030 women and 888 men aged 55-74 years. MEASUREMENTS: Five baseline exposure measures (weight (WT), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR)) at baseline, and disability outcomes (measured gait speed, self-reported mobility problems, instrumental and ordinary activities of daily living (I/ADLs)) after 5 years. RESULTS: Individually, the heaviest quartile of WC and WHR predicted disability using all outcomes in men. In women, the heaviest category of each of the five exposure measures predicted disability, for each of the outcomes. In competing measures models, WC was included in the best fit model of tested mobility disability in men (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.1; P<0.05) and women (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.9-4.8; P<0.001), adjusted for age, height, smoking, social class, and education. WC was also included in the best fit model of all self-reported disabilities in men, and for self-reported I/ADL disabilities in women. CONCLUSIONS: Across the periretirement age period, body mass and shape are major determinants of disability, with increases in WC, a marker for abdominal obesity, best predicting risk for most disability outcomes. This result adds to the case for WC to be used in estimates of obesity-related health risks for epidemiological monitoring and clinical care.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the risk of periretirement age disability associated with five different anthropometric measures of body mass and shape, and to compare the measures in this group, the peak age group of obesity prevalence. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of Health Survey for England 1998 respondents followed-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing in 2002. SUBJECTS: National population sample of 1030 women and 888 men aged 55-74 years. MEASUREMENTS: Five baseline exposure measures (weight (WT), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR)) at baseline, and disability outcomes (measured gait speed, self-reported mobility problems, instrumental and ordinary activities of daily living (I/ADLs)) after 5 years. RESULTS: Individually, the heaviest quartile of WC and WHR predicted disability using all outcomes in men. In women, the heaviest category of each of the five exposure measures predicted disability, for each of the outcomes. In competing measures models, WC was included in the best fit model of tested mobility disability in men (odds ratio (OR) 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.1; P<0.05) and women (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.9-4.8; P<0.001), adjusted for age, height, smoking, social class, and education. WC was also included in the best fit model of all self-reported disabilities in men, and for self-reported I/ADL disabilities in women. CONCLUSIONS: Across the periretirement age period, body mass and shape are major determinants of disability, with increases in WC, a marker for abdominal obesity, best predicting risk for most disability outcomes. This result adds to the case for WC to be used in estimates of obesity-related health risks for epidemiological monitoring and clinical care.
Authors: Wendy C King; Scott G Engel; Katherine A Elder; William H Chapman; George M Eid; Bruce M Wolfe; Steven H Belle Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: M Martínez-Reig; L Gómez-Arnedo; S A Alfonso-Silguero; G Juncos-Martínez; L Romero; P Abizanda Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: J A Batsis; T A Mackenzie; E Vasquez; C M Germain; R T Emeny; P Rippberger; F Lopez-Jimenez; S J Bartels Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Rachel A Murphy; Ilse Reinders; Thomas C Register; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Bret H Goodpaster; Eleanor M Simonsick; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Tamara B Harris Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Andrea Z LaCroix; Molly E Waring; Candyce H Kroenke; Michael J LaMonte; Mara Z Vitolins; Rebecca Seguin; Christina L Bell; Margery Gass; Todd M Manini; Kamal H Masaki; Robert B Wallace Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Sari Stenholm; Tamara B Harris; Taina Rantanen; Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: S Stenholm; D Alley; S Bandinelli; M E Griswold; S Koskinen; T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 5.095