BACKGROUND: A CSF flow study in patients with Chiari malformation (ChM) who undergo craniocervical junction decompression (CCJD). METHODS: Using spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow velocities were measured at the prepontine (PP), anterior cervical (AC), and posterior cervical (PC) subarachnoid spaces (SAS) in healthy subjects (n = 11) and patients with Chiari malformation (ChM) before and/or after CCJD (n = 15). In the syringes, the intrasyrigeal pulsatile CSF motion was estimated qualitatively as present or absent. FINDINGS: In normal subjects, the mean CSF velocities were 2.4 +/- 0.2 cm/s (PP), 2.8 +/- 0.3 cm/s (AC), and 2.4 +/- 0.2 cm/s (PC). Velocities were significantly lower than normal in patients with ChM prior to CCJD, reduced by 38%, 25%, and 79% in the 3 regions, respectively (P<0.001). Post-CCJD, velocities were 20% (PP), 100% (AC), and 40% (PC) greater than preoperatively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ChM, the posterior cervical CSF flow velocity was low, increased minimally after CCJD and, by itself, had limited predictive value. Post-CCJD, an increase of the sum of anterior and posterior cervical CSF flow velocities by more than 20% consistently preceded or coincided with marked headache improvement. After CCJD, the finding that the intrasyringeal CSF pulsatile motion had become absent was an earlier and more sensitive predictor of motor or sensory improvement than a reduction in syrinx's size. SPAMM can be used to assess whether CCJD has restored CSF flow, predict outcome and provide pathophysiological insights in ChM and syringomyelia.
BACKGROUND: A CSF flow study in patients with Chiari malformation (ChM) who undergo craniocervical junction decompression (CCJD). METHODS: Using spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow velocities were measured at the prepontine (PP), anterior cervical (AC), and posterior cervical (PC) subarachnoid spaces (SAS) in healthy subjects (n = 11) and patients with Chiari malformation (ChM) before and/or after CCJD (n = 15). In the syringes, the intrasyrigeal pulsatile CSF motion was estimated qualitatively as present or absent. FINDINGS: In normal subjects, the mean CSF velocities were 2.4 +/- 0.2 cm/s (PP), 2.8 +/- 0.3 cm/s (AC), and 2.4 +/- 0.2 cm/s (PC). Velocities were significantly lower than normal in patients with ChM prior to CCJD, reduced by 38%, 25%, and 79% in the 3 regions, respectively (P<0.001). Post-CCJD, velocities were 20% (PP), 100% (AC), and 40% (PC) greater than preoperatively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In ChM, the posterior cervical CSF flow velocity was low, increased minimally after CCJD and, by itself, had limited predictive value. Post-CCJD, an increase of the sum of anterior and posterior cervical CSF flow velocities by more than 20% consistently preceded or coincided with marked headache improvement. After CCJD, the finding that the intrasyringeal CSF pulsatile motion had become absent was an earlier and more sensitive predictor of motor or sensory improvement than a reduction in syrinx's size. SPAMM can be used to assess whether CCJD has restored CSF flow, predict outcome and provide pathophysiological insights in ChM and syringomyelia.
Authors: R A Bhadelia; E Frederick; S Patz; P Dubey; S H Erbay; D Do-Dai; C Heilman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nicholas Shaffer; Bryn A Martin; Brandon Rocque; Casey Madura; Oliver Wieben; Bermans J Iskandar; Stephen Dombrowski; Mark Luciano; John N Oshinski; Francis Loth Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Suraj Thyagaraj; Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Lucas R Sass; Francis Loth; Morteza Vatani; Jae-Won Choi; R Shane Tubbs; Daniel Giese; Jan-Robert Kroger; Alexander C Bunck; Bryn A Martin Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Bryn A Martin; Wojciech Kalata; Nicholas Shaffer; Paul Fischer; Mark Luciano; Francis Loth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240