Literature DB >> 16227845

Corneal graft survival after prolonged storage in Optisol-GS.

Michael D Wagoner1, El-Sayed Gonnah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of corneal transplants performed with donor corneas that had been stored for prolonged (>168 hours) periods of time in Optisol-GS storage media.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of every patient who underwent corneal transplantation between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 1999 utilizing donor tissue that had been in Optisol-GS storage medium for more than 168 hours.
RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four corneal transplants met the inclusion criteria. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.7 +/- 14.7 months (range 2 to 56 months). The mean Optisol-GS storage time was 237.1 +/- 41.6 hours (range 168 to 348 hours). The overall graft survival rate was 78.6%, ranging from a high of 100% for keratoconus to a low of 42.9% for therapeutic grafts. The likelihood of graft survival, of achieving a visual outcome of 20/40 or better, or of suffering a visual outcome of 20/200 or worse, was not statistically significantly affected by progressively longer periods of donor storage time for the entire study population or for any recipient diagnosis. There were no cases of primary graft failure or early (<3 months) microbial keratitis. An epithelial defect was present on the first postoperative day in every eye. Increased donor storage time was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of persistence of the postoperative epithelial defect for more than 7 days (P = 0.01) as well as for more than 14 days (P = 0.008), although the presence of a postoperative persistent epithelial defect did not have a statistically significant adverse impact on graft survival or visual outcome.
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory surgical outcomes can be achieved utilizing donor corneas that have been stored in Optisol-GS media for more than 7 days. Ophthalmologists utilizing such tissue should be cognizant of the inevitability of postoperative epithelial defects in these cases as well as increased likelihood of development of persistent epithelial defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227845     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000159731.52801.b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  12 in total

1.  Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.

Authors:  H Al-Mezaine; M D Wagoner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Graft failure: II. Ocular surface complications.

Authors:  Samar A Al-Swailem
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Donor risk factors for graft failure in a 20-year study of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; Nancy N Diehl; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04

5.  The injection of DisCoVisc into the anterior chamber improved corneal preservation and transplantation for cornea blind patients.

Authors:  Bing Li; Li Chen; Yihui Chen; Jiajun Lu; Hao Liu; Yu Liu; Panpan Yao; Rui Liu; Minjie Sheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Quantitative Assessment of Biomechanical Properties of the Human Keratoconus Cornea Using Acoustic Radiation Force Optical Coherence Elastography.

Authors:  Yanzhi Zhao; Hongwei Yang; Yingjie Li; Yongbo Wang; Xiao Han; Yirui Zhu; Yubao Zhang; Guofu Huang
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.048

7.  Outcome of primary adult optical penetrating keratoplasty with imported donor corneas.

Authors:  Michael D Wagoner; El-Sayed Gonnah; Abdul-Elah Al-Towerki
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Corneal Donation: Current Guidelines and Future Direction.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Varshini S Odayar; Shannon E McCabe; Yasmyne C Ronquillo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Beth A Benetz; Robin L Gal; Anthony J Aldave; Michelle M Corrigan; Steven P Dunn; Ty L McCall; Sudeep Pramanik; George O Rosenwasser; Kevin W Ross; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Preparing uniform-thickness corneal endothelial grafts from donor tissues using a non-amplified femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Kanwarpal Singh; Nour Haydari; Isabelle Brunette; Santiago Costantino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.