Literature DB >> 16226580

Thalamic relays and cortical functioning.

S Murray Sherman1.   

Abstract

Studies on the visual thalamic relays, the lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar, provide three key properties that have dramatically changed the view that the thalamus serves as a simple relay to get information from subcortical sites to cortex. First, the retinal input, although a small minority (7%) in terms of numbers of synapses onto geniculate relay cells, dominates receptive field properties of these relay cells and strongly drives them; 93% of input thus is nonretinal and modulates the relay in dynamic and important ways related to behavioral state, including attention. We call the retinal input the driver input and the nonretinal, modulator input, and their unique morphological and functional differences allow us to recognize driver and modulator input to many other thalamic relays. Second, much of the modulation is related to control of a voltage-gated, low threshold Ca(2+) conductance that determines response properties of relay cells -burst or tonic - and this, among other things, affects the salience of information relayed. Third, the lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar (a massive but generally mysterious and ignored thalamic relay), are examples of two different types of relay: the LGN is a first order relay, transmitting information from a subcortical driver source (retina), while the pulvinar is mostly a higher order relay, transmitting information from a driver source emanating from layer 5 of one cortical area to another area. Higher order relays seem especially important to general corticocortical communication, and this view challenges the conventional dogma that such communication is based on direct corticocortical connections. In this sense, any new information reaching a cortical area, whether from a subcortical source or another cortical area, benefits from a thalamic relay. Other examples of first and higher order relays also exist, and generally higher order relays represent the majority of thalamus. A final property of interest emphasized in chapter 17 by Guillery (2005) is that most or all driver inputs to thalamus, whether from a subcortical source or from layer 5 of cortex, are axons that branch, with the extrathalamic branch innervating a motor or premotor region in the brainstem, or in some cases, spinal cord. This suggests that actual information relayed by thalamus to cortex is actually a copy of motor instructions (Guillery, 2005). Overall, these features of thalamic relays indicate that the thalamus not only provides a behaviorally relevant, dynamic control over the nature of information relayed, it also plays a key role in basic corticocortical communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226580     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  105 in total

1.  Analysis of time and space invariance of BOLD responses in the rat visual system.

Authors:  Christopher J Bailey; Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Peter Herman; Hal Blumenfeld; Albert Gjedde; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Comparison of synaptic transmission and plasticity between sensory and cortical synapses on relay neurons in the ventrobasal nucleus of the rat thalamus.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Hsu; Hsiu-Wen Yang; Cheng-Tung Yen; Ming-Yuan Min
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A generalized linear model of the impact of direct and indirect inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Baktash Babadi; Alexander Casti; Youping Xiao; Ehud Kaplan; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  State-dependent gating of sensory inputs by zona incerta.

Authors:  Jason C Trageser; Kathryn A Burke; Radi Masri; Ying Li; Larisa Sellers; Asaf Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Corticothalamic feedback enhances stimulus response precision in the visual system.

Authors:  Ian M Andolina; Helen E Jones; Wei Wang; Adam M Sillito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fewer driver synapses in higher order than in first order thalamic relays.

Authors:  S C Van Horn; S M Sherman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of oculomotor abnormalities in the infantile strabismus syndrome.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Adam Pallus; Jérome Fleuriet; Michael J Mustari; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Plasticity between neuronal pairs in layer 4 of visual cortex varies with synapse state.

Authors:  Ignacio Sáez; Michael J Friedlander
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Metabolic demands of neural-hemodynamic associated and disassociated areas in brain.

Authors:  Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Peter Herman; Douglas L Rothman; Hal Blumenfeld; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.