Literature DB >> 16226150

Bayesian analysis of fingerprint, face and signature evidences with automatic biometric systems.

Joaquin Gonzalez-Rodriguez1, Julian Fierrez-Aguilar, Daniel Ramos-Castro, Javier Ortega-Garcia.   

Abstract

The Bayesian approach provides a unified and logical framework for the analysis of evidence and to provide results in the form of likelihood ratios (LR) from the forensic laboratory to court. In this contribution we want to clarify how the biometric scientist or laboratory can adapt their conventional biometric systems or technologies to work according to this Bayesian approach. Forensic systems providing their results in the form of LR will be assessed through Tippett plots, which give a clear representation of the LR-based performance both for targets (the suspect is the author/source of the test pattern) and non-targets. However, the computation procedures of the LR values, especially with biometric evidences, are still an open issue. Reliable estimation techniques showing good generalization properties for the estimation of the between- and within-source variabilities of the test pattern are required, as variance restriction techniques in the within-source density estimation to stand for the variability of the source with the course of time. Fingerprint, face and on-line signature recognition systems will be adapted to work according to this Bayesian approach showing both the likelihood ratios range in each application and the adequacy of these biometric techniques to the daily forensic work.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226150     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  2 in total

1.  A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Charles E H Berger; Graham Jackson; Ian W Evett; Christophe Champod; Bernard Robertson; James M Curran; Duncan Taylor; Bruce S Weir; Michael D Coble; John S Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Source-anchored, trace-anchored, and general match score-based likelihood ratios for camera device identification.

Authors:  Stephanie Reinders; Yong Guan; Danica Ommen; Jennifer Newman
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 1.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.