Literature DB >> 1622323

Functional electric stimulation: its efficacy and safety in improving pulmonary function and musculoskeletal fitness.

P B Arnold1, P P McVey, W J Farrell, T M Deurloo, A R Grasso.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of functional electric stimulation (FES) in improving cardiovascular and musculoskeletal fitness in individuals with spinal cord injury was evaluated. Ten males and two females aged 16 to 46 years began an FES program from three months to 22 years after injury. Seven patients had paraplegia and five had quadriplegia. The FES protocol consisted of three phases: (1) leg extension, the stimulation of the quadriceps muscle group only, first without and then with weights; (2) ergometry, the stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal muscles to produce a bicycling motion; and (3) resistance, the addition of resistance during the bicycling motion described in phase 2. Values for tidal volume, oxygen consumption, and the respiratory quotient were obtained during each phase. Tidal volume and oxygen consumption levels increased significantly (p less than .001) from the start of FES to both the ergometry and the resistance phases. The respiratory quotient improved significantly (p less than .001) from the start of FES to resistance but not from the start of FES to ergometry. Thigh and calf girths were measured at the start of FES and during resistance. Thigh girths increased significantly from the beginning of the program to the resistance phase, p less than .002 for the right leg and p less than .001 for the left. Calf girth, however, showed no significant increase. Based on these improvements and the absence of any serious complications, we believe that FES is an effective and safe method to improve cardiovascular and musculoskeletal fitness in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1622323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  7 in total

1.  [Paraplegic cycling using functional electrical stimulation. Experimental and model-based study of power output].

Authors:  J Szecsi; S Krafczyk; J Quintern; M Fiegel; A Straube; T Brandt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Funktionelle Elektrostimulation Paraplegischer Patienten.

Authors:  Helmut Kern
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2014-07-08

Review 3.  Oxygen consumption during functional electrical stimulation-assisted exercise in persons with spinal cord injury: implications for fitness and health.

Authors:  Dries M Hettinga; Brian J Andrews
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Screening and habituation of functional electrical stimulation-leg cycle ergometry for individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  Amira E Tawashy; Janice J Eng; Andrei V Krassioukov; Darren E R Warburton; Maureen C Ashe; Chihya Hung
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  A Comparison of FES and SCS for Neuroplastic Recovery After SCI: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lynsey D Duffell; Nicholas de Neufvillle Donaldson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  The Diagnosis and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk and Cardiometabolic Syndrome after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Gary J Farkas; Adam M Burton; David W McMillan; Alicia Sneij; David R Gater
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 7.  Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.

Authors:  Jan W van der Scheer; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Sydney E Valentino; Glen M Davis; Chester H Ho
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.