Literature DB >> 16223195

Genetics: uphold the rights of all clients to informed decision-making and voluntary action.

Jo Haydon1.   

Abstract

This article discusses the rights of patients in relation to types of genetic tests and the broader implications for families. Use and misuse of genetic information is considered, including scenarios and points to consider. The use of a non-directive approach in genetic counselling is emphasised and multifactorial disorders, prenatal diagnosis and learning disabilities are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16223195     DOI: 10.7748/ns2005.09.20.3.48.c3965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Stand        ISSN: 0029-6570


  5 in total

1.  Framing, truth telling and the problem with non-directive counselling.

Authors:  D Kirklin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Opinions and experiences of recontacting patients: a survey of Australasian genetic health professionals.

Authors:  Bhavya Bhupen Vora; Helen Mountain; Cassandra Nichols; Lyn Schofield
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-11

3.  Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Authors:  Inez Raes; An Ravelingien; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Enhancing the participation of african americans in health-related genetic research: findings of a collaborative academic and community-based research study.

Authors:  Sandra Millon Underwood; Aaron G Buseh; Sheryl T Kelber; Patricia E Stevens; Leolia Townsend
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-12-04

5.  What can we Learn from Patients' Ethical Thinking about the right 'not to know' in Genomics? Lessons from Cancer Genetic Testing for Genetic Counselling.

Authors:  Lorraine Cowley
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 1.898

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.