Literature DB >> 16222626

Blood pressure and coronary heart disease: a review of the evidence.

Carlene M M Lawes1, Derrick A Bennett, Sarah Lewington, Anthony Rodgers.   

Abstract

Overviews of randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies provide the most reliable data on the association between blood pressure and coronary heart disease (CHD). The totality of evidence indicates a strong association between blood pressure and CHD, which is continuous down to levels of at least 115 mm Hg systolic. Overall, for those 60 to 69 years of age, a 10 mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure is associated with about one-fifth lower risk of a CHD event. The size and shape of this association is consistent across regions, for males and females, and for fatal events as well as nonfatal myocardial infarction. Trials comparing active treatment to placebo or no treatment have demonstrated that the benefits of blood pressure lowering with different classes of drugs (e.g., diuretics, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists) are broadly similar, with approximately one-fifth reduction in CHD. ACE inhibitors achieve this with relatively modest blood pressure reductions, but the size of the reduction for calcium antagonists remains uncertain and appears somewhat less than expected from the blood pressure reduction. Trials confirm the expectation from cohort studies of benefits increasing with the amount of blood pressure lowering, and benefit accruing among those with average or even below average blood pressure. Observational data suggest that the proportional association is attenuated with age, but attenuation is less evident in trial data. However, in both cohort studies and clinical trials, CHD risk differences associated with a given blood pressure difference increase with age. The important points to emerge from this review are, first, that the relative benefits of blood pressure lowering for CHD prevention are likely to be consistent across a range of different populations. Second, there is likely to be considerable benefit with blood pressure lowering below "traditional" hypertension thresholds, especially in those with high absolute risk. Third, initiating and maintaining the maximum tolerated blood pressure reduction is a more important issue than choice of initial agent. Finally, and most importantly, the large majority of people have suboptimal blood pressure (e.g., systolic > 115 mm Hg) and so initiatives to lower blood pressure population-wide are an essential adjunct to targeted treatment programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 16222626     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Vasc Med        ISSN: 1528-9648


  23 in total

1.  Molecular adaptations in vasoactive systems during acute stroke in salt-induced hypertension.

Authors:  Nicole M Ventura; Nichole T Peterson; M Yat Tse; R David Andrew; Stephen C Pang; Albert Y Jin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Tendency for age-specific mortality with hypertension in the European Union from 1980 to 2011.

Authors:  Lichan Tao; Cunying Pu; Shutong Shen; Hongyi Fang; Xiuzhi Wang; Qinkao Xuan; Junjie Xiao; Xinli Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

3.  Validating prediction equations for mid-arm circumference measurements in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2012.

Authors:  Tatiana Nwankwo; Yechiam Ostchega; Guangyu Zhang; Jeffery P Hughes
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Hypertension management by family physicians: is it time to pat ourselves on the back?

Authors:  Karen Tu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Does albuminuria correlate with silent myocardial ischemia and delayed heart rate recovery in hypertensive men without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Johan Winata; Agnes L Panda; R Abdul Azis
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Saturated Fat Consumption and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke: A Science Update.

Authors:  Joyce A Nettleton; Ingeborg A Brouwer; Johanna M Geleijnse; Gerard Hornstra
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.374

7.  Understanding the decline of mean systolic blood pressure in Japan: an analysis of pooled data from the National Nutrition Survey, 1986-2002.

Authors:  Nayu Ikeda; Emmanuela Gakidou; Toshihiko Hasegawa; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  Mechanisms of load dependency of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Mahmood S Mozaffari; Jun Yao Liu; Worku Abebe; Babak Baban
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-11-01

9.  2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.