Literature DB >> 16220488

Interval estimation for treatment effects using propensity score matching.

Jennifer Hill1, Jerome P Reiter.   

Abstract

In causal studies without random assignment of treatment, causal effects can be estimated using matched treated and control samples, where matches are obtained using estimated propensity scores. Propensity score matching can reduce bias in treatment effect estimators in cases where the matched samples have overlapping covariate distributions. Despite its application in many applied problems, there is no universally employed approach to interval estimation when using propensity score matching. In this article, we present and evaluate approaches to interval estimation when using propensity score matching.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16220488     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  27 in total

1.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study.

Authors:  Madeleine Durand; Mireille E Schnitzer; Menglan Pang; Greg Carney; Sherif Eltonsy; Kristian B Filion; Anat Fisher; Min Jun; I Fan Kuo; Christel Renoux; J Michael Paterson; Jacqueline Quail; Alexis Matteau
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-12-18

3.  Childhood sexual trauma and subsequent parenting beliefs and behaviors.

Authors:  B J Zvara; W R Mills-Koonce; K Appleyard Carmody; M Cox
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2015-02-11

4.  simcausal R Package: Conducting Transparent and Reproducible Simulation Studies of Causal Effect Estimation with Complex Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Oleg Sofrygin; Mark J van der Laan; Romain Neugebauer
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 6.440

5.  Results of 100 consecutive laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies: postoperative outcome, cost-benefit analysis, and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Denise Ferrari; Gianpaolo Balzano; Walter Zuliani; Renato Castoldi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Which Propensity Score Method Best Reduces Confounder Imbalance? An Example From a Retrospective Evaluation of a Childhood Obesity Intervention.

Authors:  Krista Schroeder; Haomiao Jia; Arlene Smaldone
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Hospice shared-care saved medical expenditure and reduced the likelihood of intensive medical utilization among advanced cancer patients in Taiwan--a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Wen-Yuan Lin; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Chih-Te Ho; Lance E Davidson; Hua-Shui Hsu; Chiu-Shong Liu; Chang-Fang Chiu; Ching-Tien Peng; Chih-Yi Chen; Wen-Yu Hu; Ling-Nu Hsu; Chia-Ing Li; Tsai-Chung Li; Chin-Yu Lin; Ching-Yu Chen; Cheng-Chieh Lin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Effects of hydroxyethyl starch 6 % (130/0.4) on blood loss during cesarean delivery: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Abdullah S Terkawi; Sarah K Larkin; Siny Tsang; Jessica S Sheeran; Mohamed Tiouririne
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Neighborhood poverty and American Indian infant death: are the effects identifiable?

Authors:  Pamela Jo Johnson; J Michael Oakes; Douglas L Anderton
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Transesophageal Echocardiography, Mortality, and Length of Hospitalization after Cardiac Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Emily J MacKay; Mark D Neuman; Lee A Fleisher; Prakash A Patel; Jacob T Gutsche; John G Augoustides; Nimesh D Desai; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.