Literature DB >> 16220400

Late effects and cosmetic results of conventional versus hypofractionated irradiation in breast-conserving therapy.

Fabian Fehlauer1, Silke Tribius, Winfried Alberti, Dirk Rades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Breast irradiation after lumpectomy is an integral component of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). As the prognosis is general good following BCT, late morbidity and cosmesis are important. The present study compares two different radiation schedules with respect to these two endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 129 breast cancer patients (pT1-2 pN0-1 cM0) were irradiated between 09/1992 and 08/1994 with either a 22-day fractionation schedule (2.5 Gy to 55 Gy, 4x/week, n = 65) or with a conventional fractionation schedule (28 days, 2.0 Gy to 55 Gy, 5x/week, n = 64), both without additional boost. The equivalent dose of 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was 55 Gy and 62 Gy, respectively. Late toxicity, assessed according to the LENT-SOMA criteria, and cosmetic outcome, graded on a 5-point scale, were evaluated after a median of 86 months (range 72-94 months) in tumor-free breast cancer patients.
RESULTS: LENT-SOMA grade 2/3 toxicity (2.5 Gy vs. 2.0 Gy): breast pain (18% vs. 11%; p = 0.3), fibrosis (57% vs. 16%; p < 0.001), telangiectasia (22% vs. 3%; p = 0.002), atrophy (31% vs. 3%; p < 0.001). Medication to breast pain was taken by 8% versus 9% of patients. Cosmesis was very good/good/acceptable in 75% versus 93% (2.5 Gy vs. 2.0 Gy; p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Late morbidity was significantly frequent and cosmesis was significantly worse after hypofractionated radiotherapy (2.5 Gy to 55 Gy). However, morbidity was not associated with major implications on daily life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16220400     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-005-1404-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  5 in total

1.  Objective assessment of dermatitis following post-operative radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving treatment.

Authors:  Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Tadashi Takenaka; Eiichi Tanaka; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Yuka Fujita; Norikazu Masuda; Keiko Kuriyama; Mineo Yoshida; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Partial-volume segmentation for dose optimization in whole-breast radiotherapy: a comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth Tromm; Andreas Meyer; Jörg Frühauf; Michael Bremer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Two-Level Factorial Pre-TomoBreast Pilot Study of Tomotherapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Post Hoc Utility of a Mean Absolute Dose Deviation Penalty Score.

Authors:  Steve Heymann; Giovanna Dipasquale; Nam P Nguyen; Meymey San; Olena Gorobets; Nicolas Leduc; Dirk Verellen; Guy Storme; Hilde Van Parijs; Mark De Ridder; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

4.  Evaluation of dosimetric variance in whole breast forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on 4DCT and 3DCT.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jian Bin Li; Hong Guang Hu; Tao Sun; Min Xu; Ting Yong Fan; Qian Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  A Pilot Assessment of Ethnic Differences in Cosmetic Outcomes following Breast Conservation Therapy.

Authors:  Elliot M Hirsch; Christiana S U Chukwu; Zeeshan Butt; Seema A Khan; Robert D Galiano
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-02-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.