Literature DB >> 16219631

Outcome and process evaluation of a Norwegian school-randomized fruit and vegetable intervention: Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks (FVMM).

E Bere1, M B Veierød, M Bjelland, K-I Klepp.   

Abstract

This study reports the effect of the Fruits and Vegetables Make the Marks intervention, a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention consisting of a home economics classroom component and parental involvement and encouraged participation in the Norwegian School Fruit Programme, all delivered during the school year of 2001-02. Nine randomly chosen schools received the intervention and 10 schools served as control schools. Participating pupils completed questionnaires at baseline (September 2001), at Follow-up 1 (May-June 2002) and at Follow-up 2 (May 2003). A total of 369 pupils (69%; mean age, 11.3 years at baseline) participated in all three surveys. No effect of the intervention was found for intake of fruit and vegetables eaten at school or all day, neither at Follow-up 1 nor at Follow-up 2. On analysing the effects on potential mediators, significant differences between intervention and control groups were found for Awareness of the five-a-day recommendations only. The intervention programme was rated as very good by the teachers, and the pupils reported that they enjoyed it. However, the intervention failed to change fruit and vegetable intake, probably because it did not succeed in changing the pupils' preferences for or the accessibility of fruit and vegetables--the two strongest correlates of children's fruit and vegetable intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219631     DOI: 10.1093/her/cyh062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  33 in total

1.  Associations between school meals offered through the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program and fruit and vegetable intake among ethnically diverse, low-income children.

Authors:  Ramona Robinson-O'Brien; Teri Burgess-Champoux; Jess Haines; Peter J Hannan; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.118

2.  The effect of a healthy school tuck shop program on the access of students to healthy foods.

Authors:  Kirang Kim; Seo Ah Hong; Sung Ha Yun; Hyun Joo Ryou; Sang Sun Lee; Mi Kyung Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 1.926

3.  Identifying barriers that hinder onsite parental involvement in a school-based health promotion program.

Authors:  Oralia Garcia-Dominic; Linda A Wray; Roberto P Treviño; Arthur E Hernandez; Zenong Yin; Jan S Ulbrecht
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2009-04-01

4.  Exploring subgroup effects by socioeconomic position of three effective school-based dietary interventions: the European TEENAGE project.

Authors:  Nanna Lien; Leen Haerens; Saskia J te Velde; Liesbeth Mercken; Knut-Inge Klepp; Laurence Moore; Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij; Fabrizio Faggiano; Frank J van Lenthe
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Study protocol: can a school gardening intervention improve children's diets?

Authors:  Meaghan S Christian; Charlotte El Evans; Mark Conner; Joan K Ransley; Janet E Cade
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Community-based interventions for enhancing access to or consumption of fruit and vegetables among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca Ganann; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Donna Ciliska; Leslea Peirson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  For whom and under what circumstances do school-based energy balance behavior interventions work? Systematic review on moderators.

Authors:  Mine Yildirim; Maartje M van Stralen; Mai J M Chinapaw; Johannes Brug; Willem van Mechelen; Jos W R Twisk; Saskia J Te Velde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2011-06-09

8.  Changes in 10-12 year old's fruit and vegetable intake in Norway from 2001 to 2008 in relation to gender and socioeconomic status - a comparison of two cross-sectional groups.

Authors:  Marit Hilsen; Maartje M van Stralen; Knut-Inge Klepp; Elling Bere
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and their determinants among 11-year-old schoolchildren between 2003 and 2009.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Johannes Brug; Nannah I Tak; Agneta Yngve; Saskia J te Velde
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers.

Authors:  Rikke Krølner; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Anne Hjøllund Christiansen; Anne Maj Christensen; Pernille Due
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.