BACKGROUND: Most studies on attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) have been conducted in healthy populations. The aim of this study is to explore and describe attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia/PAS in cancer patients with short life expectancy. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 18 cancer patients with a life expectancy of less than nine months. All patients were recruited from an inpatient palliative medicine unit. RESULTS: Patients holding a positive attitude towards euthanasia/PAS do not necessarily want euthanasia/PAS for themselves. Wishes are different from requests for euthanasia/PAS. Fear of future pain and a painful death were the main reasons given for a possible wish for euthanasia/PAS. Worries about minimal quality of life and lack of hope also contributed to such thoughts. Wishes for euthanasia/PAS were hypothetical; they were future oriented and with a prerequisite that intense pain, lack of quality of life and/or hope had to be present. Additionally, wishes were fluctuating and ambivalent. CONCLUSION: The wish to die in these patients does not seem to be constant. Rather, this wish is more appropriately seen as an ambivalent and fluctuating mental 'solution' for the future. Health care providers should be aware of this when responding to utterances regarding euthanasia/PAS.
BACKGROUND: Most studies on attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) have been conducted in healthy populations. The aim of this study is to explore and describe attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia/PAS in cancerpatients with short life expectancy. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 18 cancerpatients with a life expectancy of less than nine months. All patients were recruited from an inpatient palliative medicine unit. RESULTS:Patients holding a positive attitude towards euthanasia/PAS do not necessarily want euthanasia/PAS for themselves. Wishes are different from requests for euthanasia/PAS. Fear of future pain and a painful death were the main reasons given for a possible wish for euthanasia/PAS. Worries about minimal quality of life and lack of hope also contributed to such thoughts. Wishes for euthanasia/PAS were hypothetical; they were future oriented and with a prerequisite that intense pain, lack of quality of life and/or hope had to be present. Additionally, wishes were fluctuating and ambivalent. CONCLUSION: The wish to die in these patients does not seem to be constant. Rather, this wish is more appropriately seen as an ambivalent and fluctuating mental 'solution' for the future. Health care providers should be aware of this when responding to utterances regarding euthanasia/PAS.
Authors: Raymond Voltz; Maren Galushko; Johanna Walisko; Ute Karbach; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff; Friedemann Nauck; Lukas Radbruch; Christoph Ostgathe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Derek W Braverman; Brian S Marcus; Paul G Wakim; Mark R Mercurio; Gary S Kopf Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Amy E Lowery; Tatiana Starr; Lara K Dhingra; Lauren Rogak; Julie R Hamrick-Price; Maria Farberov; Kenneth L Kirsh; Leonard B Saltz; William S Breitbart; Steven D Passik Journal: Pain Med Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Veronica Dussel; Steven Joffe; Joanne M Hilden; Jan Watterson-Schaeffer; Jane C Weeks; Joanne Wolfe Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2010-03
Authors: S Reiter-Theil; T Graf-Baumann; K Kutzer; H C Müller-Busch; R Stutzki; H C Traue; A Willweber-Strumpf; M Zimmermann; M Zenz Journal: Schmerz Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Madeline Li; Gilla K Shapiro; Roberta Klein; Anne Barbeau; Anne Rydall; Jennifer A H Bell; Rinat Nissim; Sarah Hales; Camilla Zimmermann; Rebecca K S Wong; Gary Rodin Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.234