Literature DB >> 16217943

Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents.

Yuri W Novitsky1, Ronald F Sing, Kent W Kercher, Martha L Griffo, Brent D Matthews, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

Incomplete or inaccurate operative notes result in delayed, reduced, or denied reimbursement. Deficient reports may be more common when dictated by the surgical residents. We performed a blinded study to assess the accuracy of residents' dictations and their effect on the appropriate level of coding for reimbursement. A prospective, blinded study was performed comparing operative reports dictated by senior surgical residents (postgraduate years 3, 4, and 5) to reports dictated by attending surgeons. All residents had previously undergone group instruction on the importance and structure of operative notes. The trainees were blinded to the fact that the attending surgeons were dictating the operative reports on a separate dictation system. The dictations were analyzed by faculty reimbursement billing personnel for accuracy and completeness. Fifty operative reports of general surgical procedures dictated by both surgical residents and attending physicians were reviewed. A total of 97 CPT codes were used to report services rendered. Residents' dictations resulted in incorrect coding in 14 cases (28% error rate). The types of inaccuracies were a completely missed procedure (4) and insufficient documentation for an appropriate CPT code and/or modifier (10). All deficiencies occurred in complex, multicode, and/or laparoscopic cases. Sixty-seven per cent of late dictations were incomplete. The financial analysis revealed that deficiencies in resident dictations would have reduced the reimbursement by $18,200 (9.7%). For cases with deficient dictations, 29.5 per cent of charges would have been missed, delayed, or denied if the resident-dictated note was used to justify charges. Operative reports dictated by surgical residents are often incomplete or inaccurate, likely leading to reduced or delayed reimbursement. Dictations of complex, multicode, or laparoscopic surgeries, especially if delayed beyond 24 hours, are likely to contain significant deficiencies that affect billing. Attending surgeons may be better equipped to dictate complex cases. Formal housestaff education, mentorship by the attending faculty, and ongoing quality control may be paramount to minimize documentation errors to ensure appropriate coding for the services rendered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  11 in total

1.  Point-of-care clinical documentation: assessment of a bladder cancer informatics tool (eCancerCareBladder): a randomized controlled study of efficacy, efficiency and user friendliness compared with standard electronic medical records.

Authors:  Peter J Bostrom; Paul J Toren; Hao Xi; Raymond Chow; Tran Truong; Justin Liu; Kelly Lane; Laura Legere; Anjum Chagpar; Alexandre R Zlotta; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Ethan D Grober; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A smart decision: smartphone use for operative data collection in arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery.

Authors:  Jill Mohr; Gregory J Strnad; Lutul Farrow; Kate Heinlein; Carolyn M Hettrich; Morgan H Jones; Anthony Miniaci; Eric Ricchetti; James Rosneck; Mark Schickendantz; Paul Saluan; Jose F Vega; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Smartphone Data Capture Efficiently Augments Dictation for Knee Arthroscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Featherall; Sameer R Oak; Gregory J Strnad; Lutul D Farrow; Morgan H Jones; Anthony A Miniaci; Richard D Parker; James T Rosneck; Paul M Saluan; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Synoptic operative reporting: assessing the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic reporting for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Shannon E Stogryn; Krista Hardy; Michael J Mullan; Jason Park; Christopher Andrew; Ashley Vergis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Resident awareness of documentation requirements and reimbursement: a multi-institutional survey.

Authors:  Kenan W Yount; Bradley N Reames; Clark D Kensinger; Marissa A Boeck; Peter W Thompson; Joseph D Forrester; Gilbert R Upchurch; Paul G Gauger; Irving L Kron; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Quality of inguinal hernia operative reports: room for improvement.

Authors:  Grace W Ma; Amandeep Pooni; Shawn S Forbes; Cagla Eskicioglu; Emily Pearsall; Fred D Brenneman; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Differences between attendings' and residents' operative notes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Linda S G L Wauben; Richard H M Goossens; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Predictors of multivisceral resection in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anand Govindarajan; Novlette Fraser; Vanessa Cranford; Debrah Wirtzfeld; Steve Gallinger; Calvin H L Law; Andrew J Smith; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Quality of narrative operative reports in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Meagan E Wiebe; Lakhbir Sandhu; Julie L Takata; Erin D Kennedy; Nancy N Baxter; Anna R Gagliardi; David R Urbach; Alice C Wei
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Evaluating narrative operative reports for endoscopic sinus surgery in a residency training program.

Authors:  Shannon C Wheeler; Amar Miglani; Nicholas L Deep; Marlene E Girardo; Michael Hinni; Devyani Lal
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.