Literature DB >> 16217645

Seeing speech affects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem.

Gabriella Musacchia1, Mikko Sams, Trent Nicol, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Afferent auditory processing in the human brainstem is often assumed to be determined by acoustic stimulus features alone and immune to stimulation by other senses or cognitive factors. In contrast, we show that lipreading during speech perception influences early acoustic processing. Event-related brainstem potentials were recorded from ten healthy adults to concordant (acoustic-visual match), conflicting (acoustic-visual mismatch) and unimodal stimuli. Audiovisual (AV) interactions occurred as early as approximately 11 ms post-acoustic stimulation and persisted for the first 30 ms of the response. Furthermore, the magnitude of interaction depended on AV pairings. These findings indicate considerable plasticity in early auditory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217645      PMCID: PMC2535928          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0071-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Diagnosis of acoustic tumors.

Authors:  A R Møller
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms of BAEP.

Authors:  A R Møller
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

4.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.

Authors:  J J McDonald; W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The effect of speechreading on masked detection thresholds for filtered speech.

Authors:  K W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  J Cunningham; T Nicol; S G Zecker; A Bradlow; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Multimodal contribution to speech perception revealed by independent component analysis: a single-sweep EEG case study.

Authors:  D E Callan; A M Callan; C Kroos; E Vatikiotis-Bateson
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-01

8.  Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  J J McDonald; L M Ward
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

9.  Neural correlates of auditory-visual stimulus onset asynchrony detection.

Authors:  K O Bushara; J Grafman; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds.

Authors:  J R Binder; J A Frost; T A Hammeke; P S Bellgowan; J A Springer; J N Kaufman; E T Possing
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  28 in total

1.  Thalamic influences on multisensory integration.

Authors:  Sascha Tyll; Eike Budinger; Toemme Noesselt
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners.

Authors:  R Bovo; A Ciorba; S Prosser; A Martini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.

Authors:  Kasper Eskelund; Jyrki Tuomainen; Tobias S Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Seeing voices: High-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion.

Authors:  Dave Saint-Amour; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Exploring the mammalian sensory space: co-operations and trade-offs among senses.

Authors:  Sirpa Nummela; Henry Pihlström; Kai Puolamäki; Mikael Fortelius; Simo Hemilä; Tom Reuter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.