BACKGROUND: During radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias tissue heating and hence lesion size depend on electrode-tissue contact and cooling of the electrode tip caused by cavitary blood flow. These factors are unique and unknown for each catheter placement in the beating heart. A tool for assessing these factors prior to ablation may indicate the lesion size which will be obtained for any given catheter position. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radiofrequency ablation was performed in vitro on strips of left ventricular porcine myocardium during two different levels of convective cooling (0 or 0.1 m/s), two different contact pressures (10 or 30 g) and parallel or perpendicular electrode-tissue orientation using 7F 4 mm tip catheters. Prior to ablation the impedance rise (DeltaIMP) caused by the obtained contact and the temperature rise with a 0.6 W 5 s test pulse (DeltaT) were measured. Subsequently, during unchanged conditions, radiofrequency ablation was performed as either temperature-controlled, power-controlled or irrigated tip ablation and lesion size was determined. DeltaIMP increased significantly (P < 0.05) by improved contact, whereas it was not affected by convective cooling. DeltaT was significantly increased by increasing contact pressure (P < 0.05) and significantly decreased by increased cooling (P < 0.001). DeltaT was not systematically affected by electrode orientation. The product of DeltaT and DeltaIMP showed a significant correlation between the obtained lesion size and power output for temperature-controlled and between lesion size and tip temperature for power-controlled ablation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ablation measurement of DeltaIMP and DeltaT can indicate the lesion size resulting after ablation in temperature-controlled, power-controlled and irrigated ablation in vitro, since DeltaT reflects cavitary cooling and to a smaller extent electrode-tissue contact, and DeltaIMP reflects only electrode-tissue contact.
BACKGROUND: During radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias tissue heating and hence lesion size depend on electrode-tissue contact and cooling of the electrode tip caused by cavitary blood flow. These factors are unique and unknown for each catheter placement in the beating heart. A tool for assessing these factors prior to ablation may indicate the lesion size which will be obtained for any given catheter position. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radiofrequency ablation was performed in vitro on strips of left ventricular porcine myocardium during two different levels of convective cooling (0 or 0.1 m/s), two different contact pressures (10 or 30 g) and parallel or perpendicular electrode-tissue orientation using 7F 4 mm tip catheters. Prior to ablation the impedance rise (DeltaIMP) caused by the obtained contact and the temperature rise with a 0.6 W 5 s test pulse (DeltaT) were measured. Subsequently, during unchanged conditions, radiofrequency ablation was performed as either temperature-controlled, power-controlled or irrigated tip ablation and lesion size was determined. DeltaIMP increased significantly (P < 0.05) by improved contact, whereas it was not affected by convective cooling. DeltaT was significantly increased by increasing contact pressure (P < 0.05) and significantly decreased by increased cooling (P < 0.001). DeltaT was not systematically affected by electrode orientation. The product of DeltaT and DeltaIMP showed a significant correlation between the obtained lesion size and power output for temperature-controlled and between lesion size and tip temperature for power-controlled ablation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ablation measurement of DeltaIMP and DeltaT can indicate the lesion size resulting after ablation in temperature-controlled, power-controlled and irrigated ablation in vitro, since DeltaT reflects cavitary cooling and to a smaller extent electrode-tissue contact, and DeltaIMP reflects only electrode-tissue contact.
Authors: Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2015-10-31