OBJECTIVES: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) with topotecan and cisplatin (TC) or cisplatin alone (C) in advanced cervical cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) as secondary objectives. METHODS:Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (C) or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1-3 q 3 weeks (TC) or methotrexate 30 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 q 4 weeks (MVAC). QOL was assessed at four time points using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx), Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT/GOG-NTX subscale), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). RESULTS:One hundred eighty-six patients (C = 60; TC = 63; MVAC = 63) were enrolled before MVAC was closed by the GOG Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred on that arm. MVAC produced a 22% overall response rate (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.34) and median PFS and OS of 4.4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. Compared with C and TC, there was more hematologic toxicity with MVAC. There were no appreciable differences in QOL scores after controlling for baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS:MVAC's clinical activity tended to be similar to that of TC but with an unacceptable risk of death from sepsis at this dose and schedule. Nevertheless, QOL, as measured by these instruments, was not substantially impaired by this regimen.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) compared methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) with topotecan and cisplatin (TC) or cisplatin alone (C) in advanced cervical cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) as secondary objectives. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (C) or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1-3 q 3 weeks (TC) or methotrexate 30 mg/m2 days 1, 15, and 22, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 q 4 weeks (MVAC). QOL was assessed at four time points using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx), Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT/GOG-NTX subscale), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients (C = 60; TC = 63; MVAC = 63) were enrolled before MVAC was closed by the GOG Data Safety Monitoring Board after four treatment-related deaths occurred on that arm. MVAC produced a 22% overall response rate (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.34) and median PFS and OS of 4.4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. Compared with C and TC, there was more hematologic toxicity with MVAC. There were no appreciable differences in QOL scores after controlling for baseline scores. CONCLUSIONS:MVAC's clinical activity tended to be similar to that of TC but with an unacceptable risk of death from sepsis at this dose and schedule. Nevertheless, QOL, as measured by these instruments, was not substantially impaired by this regimen.
Authors: L M Wiltink; M King; F Müller; M S Sousa; M Tang; A Pendlebury; J Pittman; N Roberts; L Mileshkin; R Mercieca-Bebber; M-A Tait; R Campbell; C Rutherford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Bruno Kovic; Xuejing Jin; Sean Alexander Kennedy; Mathieu Hylands; Michal Pedziwiatr; Akira Kuriyama; Huda Gomaa; Yung Lee; Morihiro Katsura; Masafumi Tada; Brian Y Hong; Sung Min Cho; Patrick Jiho Hong; Ashley M Yu; Yasmin Sivji; Augustin Toma; Li Xie; Ludwig Tsoi; Marcin Waligora; Manya Prasad; Neera Bhatnagar; Lehana Thabane; Michael Brundage; Gordon Guyatt; Feng Xie Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Richard T Penson; Helen Q Huang; Lari B Wenzel; Bradley J Monk; Sharon Stockman; Harry J Long; Lois M Ramondetta; Lisa M Landrum; Ana Oaknin; Thomas J A Reid; Mario M Leitao; Michael Method; Helen Michael; Krishnansu S Tewari Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Marjorie Jenkins; Maurizio Chiriva-Internati; Leonardo Mirandola; Catherine Tonroy; Sean S Tedjarati; Nicole Davis; Nicholas D'Cunha; Lukman Tijani; Fred Hardwick; Diane Nguyen; W Martin Kast; Everardo Cobos Journal: Int Rev Immunol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.311
Authors: Dana Chase; Helen Q Huang; Bradley J Monk; Lois Michelle Ramondetta; Richard T Penson; Karen Gil; Lisa M Landrum; Mario Leitao; Ana Oaknin; Warner K Huh; Heather L Pulaski; Katina Robison; Saketh R Guntupalli; Debra Richardson; Ritu Salani; Michael W Sill; Lari B Wenzel; Krishnansu Sujata Tewari Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: David Scott Miller; John A Blessing; Lois M Ramondetta; Huyen Q Pham; Krishnansu S Tewari; Lisa M Landrum; Jubilee Brown; Robert S Mannel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rieneke van de Ven; Sue Ellen Verbrugge; Anneke W Reurs; Hetty J Bontkes; Erik Hooijberg; Gerrit Jansen; Rik J Scheper; George L Scheffer; Tanja D de Gruijl Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Virginia M Rosen; Ines Guerra; Mary McCormack; Angélica Nogueira-Rodrigues; Andre Sasse; Veronica C Munk; Aijing Shang Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.437