BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We decided to evaluate the clinical and biochemical predictors of postprandial lipemia, measured as daylong capillarly triglycerides (TGc) profiles, in normolipidemic non diabetic subjects. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 76 normolipidemic non diabetic subjects (45 premenopausal females). Accutrend was used to measure daylong TGc profiles during 3 days in 6 previously standardized points: fasting, pre and 3 h after dinner and lunch and at bedtime. The area under the curve of TGc (AUC-TGc) was determined as expression of postprandial lipemia. RESULTS: Males showed significantly higher AUC-TGc (26.20 [11.00] vs 19.12 [6.57] in females; p < 0.001). Obese showed significantly higher values of AUC-TGc (27.87 [12.47] vs 20.05 [7.04]; p < 0.01). The AUC-TGc correlated with: age (r = 0.242; p < 0.05), body mass index (r = 0.312; p < 0.01), waist circumference (r = 0.394; p < 0.01), fasting plasma triglyceride (r = 0.634; p < 0.001), fasting insulinemia (r = 0.485; p < 0.001) and fasting HOMA (r = 0.484; p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that HOMA (regression coefficient: 0.352; p = 0.02) and waist circumference (regression coefficient: 0.4; p = 0.05) were independent predictors of the AUC-TGc. CONCLUSIONS: Independent determinants of postprandial lipemia were waist circumference and HOMA.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We decided to evaluate the clinical and biochemical predictors of postprandial lipemia, measured as daylong capillarly triglycerides (TGc) profiles, in normolipidemic non diabetic subjects. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 76 normolipidemic non diabetic subjects (45 premenopausal females). Accutrend was used to measure daylong TGc profiles during 3 days in 6 previously standardized points: fasting, pre and 3 h after dinner and lunch and at bedtime. The area under the curve of TGc (AUC-TGc) was determined as expression of postprandial lipemia. RESULTS: Males showed significantly higher AUC-TGc (26.20 [11.00] vs 19.12 [6.57] in females; p < 0.001). Obese showed significantly higher values of AUC-TGc (27.87 [12.47] vs 20.05 [7.04]; p < 0.01). The AUC-TGc correlated with: age (r = 0.242; p < 0.05), body mass index (r = 0.312; p < 0.01), waist circumference (r = 0.394; p < 0.01), fasting plasma triglyceride (r = 0.634; p < 0.001), fasting insulinemia (r = 0.485; p < 0.001) and fasting HOMA (r = 0.484; p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that HOMA (regression coefficient: 0.352; p = 0.02) and waist circumference (regression coefficient: 0.4; p = 0.05) were independent predictors of the AUC-TGc. CONCLUSIONS: Independent determinants of postprandial lipemia were waist circumference and HOMA.