Literature DB >> 16215374

Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: a report from the OPTAMA Program.

Heather K Sun1, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the probability of achieving specific pharmacodynamic exposures of commonly used intravenous antibiotics for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia against those pathogens most commonly implicated in the disease.
DESIGN: Ten thousand-subject Monte Carlo simulation.
SETTING: Research center. SUBJECT: None.
INTERVENTIONS: Pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted for the following antimicrobials at standard doses: meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin. Prevalence of causative pathogens was based on the 2000 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were obtained using the 2003 US MYSTIC database. The probabilities of each drug and dosing regimen in achieving pharmacodynamic targets were calculated. Bactericidal targets were defined as 40% T>MIC for the carbapenems, 50% T>MIC for other beta-lactams, and an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of 125 for ciprofloxacin. A sensitivity analysis was performed using two alternate models to determine the impact of varying pathogen prevalence on target attainment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Meropenem and imipenem provided high probabilities of achieving their bactericidal target of 40% T>MIC, with target attainments of 98% for all regimens. At the bactericidal end point of 50% T>MIC, cefepime 2 g every 8 hrs displayed the highest target attainment at 99.9%, followed by cefepime 2 g every 12 hrs, ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hrs, piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hrs and 3.375 g every 6 hrs, cefepime 1 g every 12 hrs, and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hrs with target attainments of 95.0%, 92.5%, 92.3%, 91.3%, 90.3%, and 67.9%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin presented the lowest probability of achieving its bactericidal target of an AUC/MIC ratio of 125, with target attainments of 54.7% and 12.0% when given as 400 mg every 8 hrs and 400 mg every 12 hrs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hrs), and piperacillin/tazobactam have high probabilities of achieving adequate pharmacodynamic exposures when given for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the absence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Ceftazidime 1g every 8 hrs and ciprofloxacin produce low target attainment rates and will not likely result in high clinical success rates when given as monotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16215374     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181528.88571.9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

Review 1.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Ceftazidime dosage regimen in intensive care unit patients: from a population pharmacokinetic approach to clinical practice via Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Bernard Georges; Jean-Marie Conil; Stéphanie Ruiz; Thierry Seguin; Pierre Cougot; Olivier Fourcade; Georges Houin; Sylvie Saivin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Cefepime: a reappraisal in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pierre-François Laterre; Thierry Dugernier; Herbert Spapen; Isabelle Delattre; Xavier Wittebole; Daniel De Backer; Brice Layeux; Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Louis Vincent; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Comparative review of the carbapenems.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ryan Wiebe; Leanne Dilay; Kristjan Thomson; Ethan Rubinstein; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The role of carbapenems in initial therapy for serious Gram-negative infections.

Authors:  James J Rahal
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Risk factors for mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Felipe F Tuon; Maria Esther Graf; Alexandre Merlini; Jaime L Rocha; Suellen Stallbaum; Lavinia N Arend; Roberto Pecoit-Filho
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.257

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.