Literature DB >> 16214506

The impact of stage and cell type on the prognosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.

Eric Lim1, Yoong K Yap, Bianca L De Stavola, Andrew G Nicholson, Peter Goldstraw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors the realization that the extent of nodal disease is related to cell type has led to a controversy as to which is the dominant prognostic factor, stage or morphology. To clarify this relationship, we studied patients treated at our institution over a 23-year period.
METHODS: This is a historical cohort study of patients with confirmed pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors who underwent lung resection from 1980 through 2003. Survivors were contacted by telephone, and recurrences were confirmed by means of histopathology. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to ascertain the joint influence of several risk factors on survival.
RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 54 years (standard deviation, 15 years), and 100 (57%) were men. The cell types for the 177 eligible patients were typical carcinoid in 89 (50%), atypical carcinoid in 15 (8%), large cell in 22 (13%), and small cell in 51 (29%). The median time to follow-up was 7 years (first to third quartile, 2-12 years), and overall 5- and 10-year survivals were 86% (79%-90%) and 81% (74%-87%), respectively. The univariable predictors of survival were age (P = .001), nodal stage (P = .01), and cell type (P < .001). In the final multivariable model only age (P = .04) and cell type (P < .001) remained as independent predictors. The hazard of death among patients with large cell or small cell lung cancer was highest in the first year and a half after diagnosis, reducing drastically thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS: In pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors cell type is the predominant determinant of survival. The survival of patients with each cell type is sufficiently diverse to warrant different management strategies. Conservative resection is feasible for typical carcinoids, but the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy need to be evaluated for the other subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214506     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Role of wedge resection in bronchial carcinoid (BC) tumors: SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Rahouma; Mohamed Kamel; Navneet Narula; Abu Nasar; Sebron Harrison; Benjamin Lee; Brendon M Stiles; Christopher Lau; Nasser K Altorki; Jeffrey L Port
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Pulmonary carcinoid tumours: incidence, histology, and surgical outcome. A population-based study.

Authors:  Astridur Petursdottir; Johanna Sigurdardottir; Bjorn M Fridriksson; Arni Johnsen; Helgi J Isaksson; Hronn Hardardottir; Steinn Jonsson; Tomas Gudbjartsson
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-28

3.  The Cancers-Specific Survival of Metastatic Pulmonary Carcinoids and Sites of Distant Metastasis: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jiandong Zhang; Qiongjie Yu; Yi He; Tingting Hu; Kun Chen; Zhihao Yang; Xingbo Zhang; Dezhi Cheng; Zhifeng He
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

4.  Surgical treatment of low and intermediate grade lung net.

Authors:  Mariano García-Yuste; José María Matilla; Miguel Angel Cañizares; Laureano Molins; Ricardo Guijarro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Subcutaneous metastasis of a pulmonary carcinoid tumor: A case report.

Authors:  Rita Linhas; David Tente; Nuno China; Sara Conde; Ana Barroso
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database.

Authors:  Qichen Chen; Mingxia Li; Pan Wang; Jinghua Chen; Hong Zhao; Jun Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.