Mariano García-Yuste1, José María Matilla1, Miguel Angel Cañizares2, Laureano Molins3, Ricardo Guijarro4. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Clinic Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Clinic Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carcinoids now constitute complex tumours which require a multidisciplinary approach and long-term follow-up. Surgical intervention is nowadays confirmed as the mainstay of treatment. METHODS: From 1980 to 2015, EMETNE-SEPAR collected 1,339 patients treated surgically for bronchial carcinoid (1,154 typical and 185 atypical carcinoids). Standard and conservative procedures were considered with regard to surgical approach. All the patients with carcinoid were pathologically coded following the standards of the 7th edition 2009 TNM lung cancer staging. Statistical analyses were performed in order to determine whether histology, nodal affectation and surgical technique were associated with significant differences in survival, presence of metastases and local recurrence. RESULTS: The influence of the surgical procedure on overall survival, the presence of metastases and local recurrence were demonstrated as no significant in our sample in central tumours (P>0.05). Sublobar resections in peripheral tumours are related to a decrease in survival in typical carcinoids (P=0.008) with nodal involvement and an increased number of recurrences in atypical carcinoids without nodal involvement (P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In central typical carcinoid, the use of lung-sparing bronchoplastic techniques could influence local recurrence in some cases. This observation demands the intraoperative pathologic verification of an adequate surgical margin by frozen section. Peripheral typical carcinoids have been surgically treated, occasionally, by sublobar resection. However, in peripheral atypical carcinoid after a limited sublobar resection the observed increase of the probability of local recurrence makes it, in our opinion, not advisable.
BACKGROUND: Carcinoids now constitute complex tumours which require a multidisciplinary approach and long-term follow-up. Surgical intervention is nowadays confirmed as the mainstay of treatment. METHODS: From 1980 to 2015, EMETNE-SEPAR collected 1,339 patients treated surgically for bronchial carcinoid (1,154 typical and 185 atypical carcinoids). Standard and conservative procedures were considered with regard to surgical approach. All the patients with carcinoid were pathologically coded following the standards of the 7th edition 2009 TNM lung cancer staging. Statistical analyses were performed in order to determine whether histology, nodal affectation and surgical technique were associated with significant differences in survival, presence of metastases and local recurrence. RESULTS: The influence of the surgical procedure on overall survival, the presence of metastases and local recurrence were demonstrated as no significant in our sample in central tumours (P>0.05). Sublobar resections in peripheral tumours are related to a decrease in survival in typical carcinoids (P=0.008) with nodal involvement and an increased number of recurrences in atypical carcinoids without nodal involvement (P=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In central typical carcinoid, the use of lung-sparing bronchoplastic techniques could influence local recurrence in some cases. This observation demands the intraoperative pathologic verification of an adequate surgical margin by frozen section. Peripheral typical carcinoids have been surgically treated, occasionally, by sublobar resection. However, in peripheral atypical carcinoid after a limited sublobar resection the observed increase of the probability of local recurrence makes it, in our opinion, not advisable.
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Andrew G Nicholson; Yasushi Yatabe; John H M Austin; Mary Beth Beasley; Lucian R Chirieac; Sanja Dacic; Edwina Duhig; Douglas B Flieder; Kim Geisinger; Fred R Hirsch; Yuichi Ishikawa; Keith M Kerr; Masayuki Noguchi; Giuseppe Pelosi; Charles A Powell; Ming Sound Tsao; Ignacio Wistuba Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Giuseppe Cardillo; Francesco Sera; Marco Di Martino; Paolo Graziano; Roberto Giunti; Luigi Carbone; Francesco Facciolo; Massimo Martelli Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Natasha Rekhtman; Patrice Desmeules; Anna M Litvak; Maria C Pietanza; Maria Lauren Santos-Zabala; Ai Ni; Joseph Montecalvo; Jason C Chang; Amanda Beras; Isabel R Preeshagul; Joshua K Sabari; Charles M Rudin; Marc Ladanyi; David S Klimstra; William D Travis; Wei-Chu Lai Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 7.842