Literature DB >> 16214258

A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population.

Kristina Burström1, Magnus Johannesson, Finn Diderichsen.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare directly elicited individual time trade-off (TTO) values in a general population sample with the social values derived using the UK EQ-5D index tariff. In the Stockholm County 1998 postal Public Health Survey (n=4950, 20-88 years), the EQ-5D self-classifier, a TTO and a rating scale (RS) question were included (n=2549 for all three questions). The mean TTO (EQ-5D) value was 0.943 (0.890) in the youngest age-group and 0.699 (0.733) in the oldest age-group. The difference between TTO and EQ-5D values was greater in more severe health status groups was. The same equation as for the UK EQ-5D index tariff was estimated for TTO and RS and resulted in significant and consistent coefficients for nearly all dimensions. The coefficients for moderate problems were closer to the EQ-5D index tariff than the coefficients for severe problems. Age was also significant after controlling for the EQ-5D dimensions (p<0.05). The results suggest that individual and social TTO values differ systematically and that the difference is greater the more severe the health status is. The social EQ-5D index tariff may also underestimate the severity in health status at older ages; age appears to correlate with additional health problems not captured by the EQ-5D classification.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214258     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  31 in total

1.  Discrepancies between the Dermatology Life Quality Index and utility scores.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Petra Baji; László Gulácsi; Sarolta Kárpáti; Márta Péntek; Adrienn Katalin Poór; Valentin Brodszky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Health related quality of life outcome instruments.

Authors:  Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Karla Kerlikowske; Andrew Loh; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Utility estimation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preference for change?

Authors:  Jennifer Petrillo; Floortje van Nooten; Paul Jones; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Patient benefit from Cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Julia Louza; John-Martin Hempel; Eike Krause; Alexander Berghaus; Joachim Müller; Thomas Braun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Ulrich Frick
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  Constantly proving the opposite? A test of CPTO using a broad time horizon and correcting for discounting.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mathias Lidgren; Nils Wilking; Bengt Jönsson; Clas Rehnberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Estimating the utility value of hypoglycaemia according to severity and frequency using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) survey.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Chin Hui Ng; Subramaniam Thanimalai; Norliza Haron; Anita Bhajan Manocha
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2018-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.