Literature DB >> 16213445

The effect of the mobile phase additives on sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and proteins by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry.

M C García1.   

Abstract

The study of the effect of mobile phases on sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and proteins by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) has been the aim of this review. Reversed-phase chromatography (RPLC) is the chromatographic mode most suitable for coupling with ESI-MS since mobile phases containing organic modifiers are used. The analysis of proteins and peptides by RPLC mostly involves the use of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as an ion-pairing agent despite its being a strong suppressor of the MS signal. Different studies reporting the effects of using other ion-pairing agents (other perfluorinated acids, acetic acid, formic acid, etc.) and buffers (ammonium acetate, ammonium formate, ammonium bicarbonate, morpholine, etc.) in RPLC-ESI-MS of proteins and peptides did not yield a single strong candidate that could generally replace TFA. The enhancement in sensitivity with other reagents observed in some cases strongly depended on the analyte, the experimental conditions used, and the mass spectrometer and, usually, it did not compensate for the loss in separation resolution related to TFA. The examples of direct coupling of affinity, size-exclusion, or ion-exchange chromatography (IEC) to ESI-MS are very limited because of incompatibilities related to the use of mobile phases containing high salt concentrations. To overcome this problem, an intermediate desalting step is needed. Multidimensional chromatography, microdialysis, and ion-capture modules can be used to couple these chromatographic modes with ESI-MS. Multidimensional chromatography with RPLC as a second dimension has most often been used. Although most examples involve the trap and analysis in the second dimension of a certain part of the first separation, some comprehensive analyses of the entire sample in the second dimension have also appeared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  19 in total

1.  End-to-end self-assembly of RADA 16-I nanofibrils in aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Paolo Arosio; Marta Owczarz; Hua Wu; Alessandro Butté; Massimo Morbidelli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  High-sensitivity TFA-free LC-MS for profiling histones.

Authors:  Jia You; Liwen Wang; Motoyasu Saji; Susan V Olesik; Matthew D Ringel; David M Lucas; John C Byrd; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Anion and cation mixed-bed ion exchange for enhanced multidimensional separations of peptides and phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Akira Motoyama; Tao Xu; Cristian I Ruse; James A Wohlschlegel; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Biological Matrix Effects in Quantitative Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Analytical Methods: Advancing Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Parinya Panuwet; Ronald E Hunter; Priya E D'Souza; Xianyu Chen; Samantha A Radford; Jordan R Cohen; M Elizabeth Marder; Kostya Kartavenka; P Barry Ryan; Dana Boyd Barr
Journal:  Crit Rev Anal Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.535

5.  Comparing the Effects of Additives on Protein Analysis Between Desorption Electrospray (DESI) and Electrospray Ionization (ESI).

Authors:  Elahe Honarvar; Andre R Venter
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Addition of Serine Enhances Protein Analysis by DESI-MS.

Authors:  Roshan Javanshad; Elahe Honarvar; Andre R Venter
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Measuring copper and zinc superoxide dismutase from spinal cord tissue using electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Timothy W Rhoads; Nathan I Lopez; Daniel R Zollinger; Jeffrey T Morré; Brian L Arbogast; Claudia S Maier; Linda DeNoyer; Joseph S Beckman
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Analysis of Glycosaminoglycans Using Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Gregory O Staples; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.837

9.  Trifluoroacetate is an allosteric modulator with selective actions at the glycine receptor.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Sangeetha V Iyer; S John Mihic
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 10.  On-line separations combined with MS for analysis of glycosaminoglycans.

Authors:  Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.